These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34266934)

  • 41. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.
    Blumenthal S; McAfee PC; Guyer RD; Hochschuler SH; Geisler FH; Holt RT; Garcia R; Regan JJ; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. PubMed ID: 16025024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes With the Activ-L Lumbar Arthroplasty System.
    Bryant JP; Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Wang MY; Garcia R
    Int J Spine Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):731-735. PubMed ID: 33077433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cervical artificial disc replacement with ProDisc-C: clinical and radiographic outcomes with long-term follow-up.
    Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Chan PG; Varma D
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 21(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 24417795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II.
    Zigler JE
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):260S-267S. PubMed ID: 15541675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year.
    Tropiano P; Huang RC; Girardi FP; Marnay T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 12902952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1600-11. PubMed ID: 21415812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Mid- to long-term results of total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review.
    Cui XD; Li HT; Zhang W; Zhang LL; Luo ZP; Yang HL
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 13(1):326. PubMed ID: 30585142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2192-9. PubMed ID: 16205346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of therapies in lumbar degenerative disc disease: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zigler J; Ferko N; Cameron C; Patel L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Mar; 7(3):233-246. PubMed ID: 29542364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Shaffrey ME; Argires PJ; Nian H; Harrell FE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Nov; 23(5):558-573. PubMed ID: 26230424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. In vivo functional performance of failed Prodisc-L devices: retrieval analysis of lumbar total disc replacements.
    Lebl DR; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Wright T; Abjornson C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1209-17. PubMed ID: 22531474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after ProDisc-L lumbar disc replacement.
    Yaszay B; Bendo JA; Goldstein JA; Quirno M; Spivak JM; Errico TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):508-12; discussion 513. PubMed ID: 18317194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up.
    Shim CS; Lee SH; Shin HD; Kang HS; Choi WC; Jung B; Choi G; Ahn Y; Lee S; Lee HY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):1012-8. PubMed ID: 17450077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Long-term Evaluation of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with the Mobi-C© Cervical Disc: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial with Seven-Year Follow-up.
    Radcliff K; Davis RJ; Hisey MS; Nunley PD; Hoffman GA; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Albert T; Coric D
    Int J Spine Surg; 2017; 11(4):31. PubMed ID: 29372135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Aesculap Activ-L artificial disc in the treatment of degenerative disc disease.
    Yue JJ; Mo FF
    BMC Surg; 2010 Apr; 10():14. PubMed ID: 20380708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
    Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years.
    Ahn PG; Kim KN; Moon SW; Kim KS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):688-95. PubMed ID: 19951021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical performance of an elastomeric lumbar disc replacement: Minimum 12 months follow-up.
    Pimenta L; Springmuller R; Lee CK; Oliveira L; Roth SE; Ogilvie WF
    SAS J; 2010; 4(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 25802645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.