These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34267572)

  • 21. The influence of stereoscopic vision on surgical performance in minimal invasive surgery-a substudy of the IDOSP-Study (Influence of 3D- vs. 4 K-Display Systems on Surgical Performance in minimal invasive surgery).
    Gietzelt C; Datta R; Busshoff J; Bruns T; Wahba R; Hedergott A
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):3069-3078. PubMed ID: 35869334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stereoacuity in unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool screening: outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.
    Richardson SR; Wright CM; Hrisos S; Buck D; Clarke MP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 46(1):150-4. PubMed ID: 15623768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Borish Vectographic Nearpoint Card II contour and random dot stereoacuity in children.
    Kulp MT
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2000; 37(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 10955543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot circles stereotests in screening and office use.
    Simons K
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Mar; 99(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 7213163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of stereoacuity with a digital mobile application.
    Bonfanti S; Gargantini A; Esposito G; Facchin A; Maffioletti M; Maffioletti S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 259(9):2843-2848. PubMed ID: 33907883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative analysis of the Lang Stereopad in a non-clinic population.
    Rowe FJ; Hepworth LR; Howard C; Chean CS; Mistry M
    Strabismus; 2019 Sep; 27(3):182-190. PubMed ID: 31329020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of a New, Filter-Free Stereopsis Test (BEST) With the Randot Stereotest in a Pediatric Cohort.
    Lagstein O; Hecht I; Anteby I
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Mar; 57(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 32203597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Amblyopia screening with random-dot stereograms.
    Walraven J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1975 Nov; 80(5):893-900. PubMed ID: 1190281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Postoperative Stereopsis in Adult Patients With Horizontal Comitant Strabismus With Normal Vision Who Are Stereoblind.
    Yan X; Lin X
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 Nov; 55(6):407-411. PubMed ID: 30452768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of factors influencing distance stereoacuity on Frisby-Davis Distance Test (FD2) in intermittent exotropia.
    Saxena R; Kakkar A; Menon V; Sharma P; Phuljhele S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 95(8):1098-101. PubMed ID: 20935306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors influencing stereoacuity outcomes in adults with acquired strabismus.
    Fawcett SL; Stager DR; Felius J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 15629283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A clinical evaluation of random dot stereoacuity cards in infants.
    Calloway SL; Lloyd IC; Henson DB
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Oct; 15(Pt 5):629-34. PubMed ID: 11702975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the INNOVA Visual Acuity System Stereotest with the Frisby-Davis 2 Stereotest for the Evaluation of Distance Stereoacuity.
    Singman EL; Matta NS; Silbert DI; Tian J
    Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2013; 28(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 23822912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.
    Fawcett SL; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2003 Oct; 7(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14566315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.
    Vancleef K; Read JCA; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28337792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of stereovision with digital testing in adults and children with normal and impaired binocularity.
    Tittes J; Baldwin AS; Hess RF; Cirina L; Wenner Y; Kuhli-Hattenbach C; Ackermann H; Kohnen T; Fronius M
    Vision Res; 2019 Nov; 164():69-82. PubMed ID: 31377344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictive factors for the perceptual learning in stereodeficient subjects.
    Portela-Camino JA; Martín-González S; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Illarramendi-Mendicute I; Piñero DP; Garrido-Mercado R
    J Optom; 2021; 14(2):156-165. PubMed ID: 32561200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monocular and binocular depth discrimination thresholds.
    Kaye SB; Siddiqui A; Ward A; Noonan C; Fisher AC; Green JR; Brown MC; Wareing PA; Watt P
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Nov; 76(11):770-82. PubMed ID: 10566862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correlation between depth perception by three-rods test and stereoacuity by distance Randot Stereotest.
    Matsuo T; Negayama R; Sakata H; Hasebe K
    Strabismus; 2014 Sep; 22(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 25058604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Stereoacuity-Dependent Concordance between Preferred Fixating Eye and Sighting Dominant Eye in Paediatric Intermittent Exotropia.
    Zhou L; Zhou Q; Bi H; Chen Y; Chen Z; Wu H; Huang Z; Zhang B
    Curr Eye Res; 2019 Sep; 44(9):948-954. PubMed ID: 31045457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.