These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3426790)

  • 1. An investigation of the mechanisms of odor suppression using physical and dichorhinic mixtures.
    Laing DG; Willcox ME
    Behav Brain Res; 1987; 26(2-3):79-87. PubMed ID: 3426790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Odor masking in the rat.
    Laing DG; Panhuber H; Slotnick BM
    Physiol Behav; 1989 Apr; 45(4):689-94. PubMed ID: 2780835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal competition between odorants: effect of different time intervals on the perception of monorhinic and dichorhinic binary mixtures.
    Rouby C; Holley A
    Perception; 1995; 24(9):1083-97. PubMed ID: 8552460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual and processing differences between physical and dichorhinic odor mixtures.
    Schütze M; Negoias S; Olsson MJ; Hummel T
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 258():84-9. PubMed ID: 24240030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Odour mixture suppression: evidence for a peripheral mechanism in human and rat.
    Bell GA; Laing DG; Panhuber H
    Brain Res; 1987 Nov; 426(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 3690320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Olfactory discrimination ability of human subjects for ten pairs of enantiomers.
    Laska M; Teubner P
    Chem Senses; 1999 Apr; 24(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 10321817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Odor detection and odor discrimination in subadult and adult rats for two enantiomeric odorants supported by c-fos data.
    Clarin T; Sandhu S; Apfelbach R
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 206(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 19766144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Honeybees learn odour mixtures via a selection of key odorants.
    Reinhard J; Sinclair M; Srinivasan MV; Claudianos C
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9110. PubMed ID: 20161714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A redefinition of odor mixture quality.
    Kay LM; Crk T; Thorngate J
    Behav Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 119(3):726-33. PubMed ID: 15998193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of d-limonene, alpha-pinene and cineole on in vitro transdermal human skin penetration of chlorpromazine and haloperidol.
    Almirall M; Montaña J; Escribano E; Obach R; Berrozpe JD
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1996 Jul; 46(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 8842336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers.
    Linster C; Johnson BA; Yue E; Morse A; Xu Z; Hingco EE; Choi Y; Choi M; Messiha A; Leon M
    J Neurosci; 2001 Dec; 21(24):9837-43. PubMed ID: 11739591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual characteristics of binary, trinary, and quaternary odor mixtures consisting of unpleasant constituents.
    Laing DG; Eddy A; Best DJ
    Physiol Behav; 1994 Jul; 56(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 8084911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spontaneous versus reinforced olfactory discriminations.
    Linster C; Johnson BA; Morse A; Yue E; Leon M
    J Neurosci; 2002 Aug; 22(16):6842-5. PubMed ID: 12177181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual interactions between characteristic notes smelled above aqueous solutions of odorant mixtures.
    Brossard C; Rousseau F; Dumont JP
    Chem Senses; 2007 May; 32(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 17301061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the masking of dimethyl sulfide odors by citronellal, limonene and citral through the use of trained odor sensor mice.
    Osada K; Hanawa M; Tsunoda K; Izumi H
    Chem Senses; 2013 Jan; 38(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 23071142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Liquid/air partition coefficients of four terpenes.
    Falk A; Gullstrand E; Löf A; Wigaeus-Hjelm E
    Br J Ind Med; 1990 Jan; 47(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 2310709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of models of odor interaction.
    Cain WS; Schiet FT; Olsson MJ; de Wijk RA
    Chem Senses; 1995 Dec; 20(6):625-37. PubMed ID: 8788096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of air flow on rat electroolfactogram.
    Scott-Johnson PE; Blakley D; Scott JW
    Chem Senses; 2000 Dec; 25(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 11114154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mitral cell temporal response patterns evoked by odor mixtures in the rat olfactory bulb.
    Giraudet P; Berthommier F; Chaput M
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Aug; 88(2):829-38. PubMed ID: 12163534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orange/lemon-scented beetles: opposite enantiomers of limonene as major constituents in the defensive secretion of related carabids.
    Attygalle AB; Wu X; Maddison DR; Will KW
    Naturwissenschaften; 2009 Dec; 96(12):1443-9. PubMed ID: 19690825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.