These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34268016)

  • 1. Shape familiarity modulates preference for curvature in drawings of common-use objects.
    Chuquichambi EG; Palumbo L; Rey C; Munar E
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11772. PubMed ID: 34268016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of presentation time on preference for curvature of real objects and meaningless novel patterns.
    Corradi G; Rosselló-Mir J; Vañó J; Chuquichambi E; Bertamini M; Munar E
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Nov; 110(4):670-685. PubMed ID: 30536967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity?
    Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Gheorghes TN; Galatsidas M
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Feb; 107(1):154-78. PubMed ID: 25871463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Replicability of the Curvature Effect as a Function of Presentation Time and Response Measure in Japanese Observers.
    Maezawa T; Tanda T; Kawahara JI
    Iperception; 2020; 11(2):2041669520915204. PubMed ID: 32284843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Curve Appeal: Exploring Individual Differences in Preference for Curved Versus Angular Objects.
    Cotter KN; Silvia PJ; Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Vartanian O
    Iperception; 2017; 8(2):2041669517693023. PubMed ID: 28491269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When symmetric and curved visual contour meet intentional instructions: Hedonic value and preference.
    Chuquichambi EG; Corradi GB; Munar E; Rosselló-Mir J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Sep; 74(9):1525-1541. PubMed ID: 34011228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects.
    Leder H; Tinio PP; Bar M
    Perception; 2011; 40(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 21936294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gaussian Curvature Entropy for Curved Surface Shape Generation.
    Okano A; Matsumoto T; Kato T
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Mar; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 33286127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An advantage for smooth compared with angular contours in the speed of processing shape.
    Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Redies C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1304-1318. PubMed ID: 31282695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aesthetic sensitivity to curvature in real objects and abstract designs.
    Corradi G; Belman M; Currò T; Chuquichambi EG; Rey C; Nadal M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():124-130. PubMed ID: 31146089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of gender and academic degree on preference for smooth curvature of abstract shapes.
    Palumbo L; Rampone G; Bertamini M
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10877. PubMed ID: 33732544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photographs of manipulable objects are named more quickly than the same objects depicted as line-drawings: Evidence that photographs engage embodiment more than line-drawings.
    Salmon JP; Matheson HE; McMullen PA
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1187. PubMed ID: 25374552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses.
    Palumbo L; Ruta N; Bertamini M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140043. PubMed ID: 26460610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying how much attention rodents allocate to motivationally-salient objects with a novel object preference test.
    Hornoiu I; Gigg J; Talmi D
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 380():112389. PubMed ID: 31783088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes.
    Munar E; Gómez-Puerto G; Call J; Nadal M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141106. PubMed ID: 26558754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beauty and the sharp fangs of the beast: degree of angularity predicts perceived preference and threat.
    Friedenberg J; Lauria G; Hennig K; Gardner I
    Psychol Res; 2023 Nov; 87(8):2594-2602. PubMed ID: 37027040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel object recognition and object location tasks in zebrafish: Influence of habituation and NMDA receptor antagonism.
    Gaspary KV; Reolon GK; Gusso D; Bonan CD
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2018 Nov; 155():249-260. PubMed ID: 30086397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments.
    Tawil N; Ascone L; Kühn S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():933344. PubMed ID: 36532994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Both predictability and familiarity facilitate contour integration.
    Sassi M; Demeyer M; Machilsen B; Putzeys T; Wagemans J
    J Vis; 2014 May; 14(5):11. PubMed ID: 24879858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Familiar shapes attract attention in figure-ground displays.
    Nelson RA; Palmer SE
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Apr; 69(3):382-92. PubMed ID: 17672426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.