132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34268444)
1. Evaluation of Glottal Inverse Filtering Algorithms Using a Physiologically Based Articulatory Speech Synthesizer.
Chien YR; Mehta DD; Guðnason J; Zañartu M; Quatieri TF
IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2017 Aug; 25(8):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 34268444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling the glottal volume-velocity waveform for three voice types.
Childers DG; Ahn C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):505-19. PubMed ID: 7860829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech synthesis by glottal excited linear prediction.
Childers DG; Hu HT
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2026-36. PubMed ID: 7963019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of Glottal Inverse Filtering in the Presence of Source-Filter Interaction.
Palaparthi A; Titze IR
Speech Commun; 2020 Oct; 123():98-108. PubMed ID: 32921855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of the voice source from speech pressure signals: evaluation of an inverse filtering technique using physical modelling of voice production.
Alku P; Story B; Airas M
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2006; 58(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 16479132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subglottal Impedance-Based Inverse Filtering of Voiced Sounds Using Neck Surface Acceleration.
Zañartu M; Ho JC; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Wodicka GR
IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2013 Sep; 21(9):1929-1939. PubMed ID: 25400531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glottal Airflow and Glottal Area Waveform Characteristics of Flow Phonation in Untrained Vocally Healthy Adults.
Patel RR; Sundberg J; Gill B; Lã FMB
J Voice; 2022 Jan; 36(1):140.e1-140.e21. PubMed ID: 32868146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glottal Adduction and Subglottal Pressure in Singing.
Herbst CT; Hess M; Müller F; Švec JG; Sundberg J
J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 25944295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic extremes of voice in the light of time domain parameters extracted from the amplitude features of glottal flow and its derivative.
Vilkman E; Alku P; Vintturi J
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):144-57. PubMed ID: 12077506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved subglottal pressure estimation from neck-surface vibration in healthy speakers producing non-modal phonation.
Lin JZ; Espinoza VM; Marks KL; Zañartu M; Mehta DD
IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process; 2020 Feb; 14(2):449-460. PubMed ID: 34079612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of subglottal pressure variation on professional baritone singers' voice sources.
Sundberg J; Andersson M; Hultqvist C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1965-71. PubMed ID: 10089615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skewing of the glottal flow with respect to the glottal area measured in natural production of vowels.
Alku P; Murtola T; Malinen J; Geneid A; Vilkman E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2501. PubMed ID: 31671985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modal and non-modal voice quality classification using acoustic and electroglottographic features.
Borsky M; Mehta DD; Van Stan JH; Gudnason J
IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2017 Dec; 25(12):2281-2291. PubMed ID: 33748320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measures of phonation type in Hmong.
Huffman MK
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 3558967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of glottal voice source quantification parameters in breathy, normal and pressed phonation of female and male speakers.
Alku P; Vilkman E
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1996; 48(5):240-54. PubMed ID: 8828282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Group differences in measures of voice production and revised values of maximum airflow declination rate.
Perkell JS; Hillman RE; Holmberg EB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):695-8. PubMed ID: 7930069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SIM--simultaneous inverse filtering and matching of a glottal flow model for acoustic speech signals.
Fröhlich M; Michaelis D; Strube HW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):479-88. PubMed ID: 11508972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective Characterization of Phonation Type Using Amplitude of Flow Glottogram Pulse and of Voice Source Fundamental.
Sundberg J
J Voice; 2022 Jan; 36(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 32402665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two inverse filtering methods in parameterization of the glottal closing phase characteristics in different phonation types.
Lehto L; Airas M; Björkner E; Sundberg J; Alku P
J Voice; 2007 Mar; 21(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 16478660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robust fundamental frequency estimation in sustained vowels: detailed algorithmic comparisons and information fusion with adaptive Kalman filtering.
Tsanas A; Zañartu M; Little MA; Fox C; Ramig LO; Clifford GD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):2885-901. PubMed ID: 24815269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
