These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification strategies. Zhao L; Cong X; Zhai L; Hu H; Xu JY; Zhao W; Zhu M; Tan M; Ye BC J Proteomics; 2020 Mar; 215():103669. PubMed ID: 31987925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mapping Plant Phosphoproteome with Improved Tandem MOAC and Label-Free Quantification. Chen Y; Liang X Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2358():105-112. PubMed ID: 34270049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent advances and challenges in plant phosphoproteomics. Silva-Sanchez C; Li H; Chen S Proteomics; 2015 Mar; 15(5-6):1127-41. PubMed ID: 25429768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample Preparation and Phosphopeptide Enrichment for Plant Phosphoproteomics via Label-Free Mass Spectrometry. Marzban G; Sulaj E Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2787():293-303. PubMed ID: 38656498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correction to: Plant Phosphopeptide Identification and Label-Free Quantification by MaxQuant and Proteome Discoverer Software. Li S; Zan H; Zhu Z; Lu D; Krall L Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2358():C1. PubMed ID: 34874537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Phosphopeptide enrichment using offline titanium dioxide columns for phosphoproteomics. Yu LR; Veenstra T Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1002():93-103. PubMed ID: 23625397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Insights from the First Phosphopeptide Challenge of the MS Resource Pillar of the HUPO Human Proteome Project. Hoopmann MR; Kusebauch U; Palmblad M; Bandeira N; Shteynberg DD; He L; Xia B; Stoychev SH; Omenn GS; Weintraub ST; Moritz RL J Proteome Res; 2020 Dec; 19(12):4754-4765. PubMed ID: 33166149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative Proteome and Phosphoproteome Profiling in Magnaporthe oryzae. Michna T; Tenzer S Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2356():109-119. PubMed ID: 34236681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mass spectrometry-driven phosphoproteomics: patterning the systems biology mosaic. Jünger MA; Aebersold R Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol; 2014; 3(1):83-112. PubMed ID: 24902836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of different phospho-tyrosine antibodies for label-free phosphoproteomics. van der Mijn JC; Labots M; Piersma SR; Pham TV; Knol JC; Broxterman HJ; Verheul HM; Jiménez CR J Proteomics; 2015 Sep; 127(Pt B):259-63. PubMed ID: 25890253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Rapid and Universal Workflow for Label-Free-Quantitation-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Studies in Cereals. He M; Wang J; Herold S; Xi L; Schulze WX Curr Protoc; 2022 Jun; 2(6):e425. PubMed ID: 35674286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parallel reaction monitoring on a Q Exactive mass spectrometer increases reproducibility of phosphopeptide detection in bacterial phosphoproteomics measurements. Taumer C; Griesbaum L; Kovacevic A; Soufi B; Nalpas NC; Macek B J Proteomics; 2018 Oct; 189():60-66. PubMed ID: 29605292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining Metabolic ¹⁵N Labeling with Improved Tandem MOAC for Enhanced Probing of the Phosphoproteome. Thomas M; Huck N; Hoehenwarter W; Conrath U; Beckers GJ Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1306():81-96. PubMed ID: 25930695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid and reproducible phosphopeptide enrichment by tandem metal oxide affinity chromatography: application to boron deficiency induced phosphoproteomics. Chen Y; Hoehenwarter W Plant J; 2019 Apr; 98(2):370-384. PubMed ID: 30589143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification and quantitation of signal molecule-dependent protein phosphorylation. Groen A; Thomas L; Lilley K; Marondedze C Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1016():121-37. PubMed ID: 23681576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Universal Sample Preparation Workflow for Plant Phosphoproteomic Profiling. Hsu CC; Arrington JV; Tao WA Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2358():93-103. PubMed ID: 34270048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing 22 Popular Phosphoproteomics Pipelines for Peptide Identification and Site Localization. Locard-Paulet M; Bouyssié D; Froment C; Burlet-Schiltz O; Jensen LJ J Proteome Res; 2020 Mar; 19(3):1338-1345. PubMed ID: 31975593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating the Efficiency of Phosphopeptide Identification by Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Hsu CC; Xue L; Arrington JV; Wang P; Paez Paez JS; Zhou Y; Zhu JK; Tao WA J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2017 Jun; 28(6):1127-1135. PubMed ID: 28283928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]