BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34270359)

  • 1. Advanced Statistics: Multiple Logistic Regression, Cox Proportional Hazards, and Propensity Scores.
    Cioci AC; Cioci AL; Mantero AMA; Parreco JP; Yeh DD; Rattan R
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2021 Aug; 22(6):604-610. PubMed ID: 34270359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.
    Lu B; Cai D; Tong X
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1846-1858. PubMed ID: 29399833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of bias in propensity score-adjusted non-linear regression models.
    Wan F; Mitra N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):846-862. PubMed ID: 27095754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controlling for confounding via propensity score methods can result in biased estimation of the conditional AUC: A simulation study.
    Galadima HI; McClish DK
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Oct; 18(5):568-582. PubMed ID: 31111682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.
    Austin PC; Thomas N; Rubin DB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):728-751. PubMed ID: 30569832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating causal effects for survival (time-to-event) outcomes by combining classification tree analysis and propensity score weighting.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):380-387. PubMed ID: 29230910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are propensity scores really superior to standard multivariable analysis?
    Biondi-Zoccai G; Romagnoli E; Agostoni P; Capodanno D; Castagno D; D'Ascenzo F; Sangiorgi G; Modena MG
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Sep; 32(5):731-40. PubMed ID: 21616172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.
    Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing treatment effects after adjustment with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity score methods.
    Martens EP; de Boer A; Pestman WR; Belitser SV; Stricker BH; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jan; 17(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17960554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity Score: an Alternative Method of Analyzing Treatment Effects.
    Kuss O; Blettner M; Börgermann J
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2016 Sep; 113(35-36):597-603. PubMed ID: 27658473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].
    Yang BG; Yu XP; Chen F; Lyu SZ; Li Q; He JQ; Yuan F
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 45(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 28100341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hazard Ratio Estimators after Terminating Observation within Matched Pairs in Sibling and Propensity Score Matched Designs.
    Shinozaki T; Mansournia MA
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Jan; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 30648668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.
    Gayat E; Resche-Rigon M; Mary JY; Porcher R
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 22411785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.
    Qin R; Titler MG; Shever LL; Kim T
    Nurs Res; 2008; 57(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 19018219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occupational Exposure to Pesticides and Lung Cancer Risk: A Propensity Score Analyses.
    Kim B; Park EY; Kim J; Park E; Oh JK; Lim MK
    Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Jan; 54(1):130-139. PubMed ID: 33794084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Johara FT; Benedetti A; Platt R; Menzies D; Viiklepp P; Schaaf S; Chan E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):257. PubMed ID: 34814845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.