These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34270359)

  • 21. Statistical methods of indirect comparison with real-world data for survival endpoint under non-proportional hazards.
    Lin Z; Zhao D; Lin J; Ni A; Lin J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Jul; 32(4):582-599. PubMed ID: 35675418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.
    Austin PC; Thomas N; Rubin DB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):728-751. PubMed ID: 30569832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sublobar resection is equivalent to lobectomy for clinical stage 1A lung cancer in solid nodules.
    Altorki NK; Yip R; Hanaoka T; Bauer T; Aye R; Kohman L; Sheppard B; Thurer R; Andaz S; Smith M; Mayfield W; Grannis F; Korst R; Pass H; Straznicka M; Flores R; Henschke CI;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):754-62; Discussion 762-4. PubMed ID: 24280722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of propensity score and disease risk score for multiple treatments with time-to-event outcome: a simulation study.
    Zhang D; Kim J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(6):1103-1115. PubMed ID: 30831052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(7):1242-58. PubMed ID: 24122911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.
    Arbogast PG; Ray WA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 21749976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Propensity score analysis with missing data.
    Cham H; West SG
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):427-45. PubMed ID: 26962757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Introduction to propensity scores.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A
    Respirology; 2014 Jul; 19(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 24889820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Comparison of Latent Variable Propensity Score Models to Traditional Propensity Score Models under Conditions of Covariate Unreliability.
    Whittaker TA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(4):625-646. PubMed ID: 31530179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Propensity Score: an Alternative Method of Analyzing Treatment Effects.
    Kuss O; Blettner M; Börgermann J
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2016 Sep; 113(35-36):597-603. PubMed ID: 27658473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The implications of propensity score variable selection strategies in pharmacoepidemiology: an empirical illustration.
    Patrick AR; Schneeweiss S; Brookhart MA; Glynn RJ; Rothman KJ; Avorn J; Stürmer T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Jun; 20(6):551-9. PubMed ID: 21394812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Covariate balance-related propensity score weighting in estimating overall hazard ratio with distributed survival data.
    Huang C; Wei K; Wang C; Yu Y; Qin G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):233. PubMed ID: 37833641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mortality Risk after Diagnosis of Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease versus Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Chang KJ; Hong CH; Lee KS; Kang DR; Lee JD; Choi SH; Kim SY; Na DL; Seo SW; Kim DK; Lee Y; Chung YK; Lim KY; Noh JS; Park J; Son SJ
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2017; 56(4):1341-1348. PubMed ID: 28157103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Cautionary Note on Using Propensity Score Calibration to Control for Unmeasured Confounding Bias When the Surrogacy Assumption Is Absent.
    Wan F
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 193(2):360-369. PubMed ID: 37759344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives.
    Benedetto U; Head SJ; Angelini GD; Blackstone EH
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Jun; 53(6):1112-1117. PubMed ID: 29684154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model.
    Klungsøyr O; Sexton J; Sandanger I; Nygård JF
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2009 Jun; 15(2):278-94. PubMed ID: 19109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Association of direct helicopter versus ground transport and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients: a propensity score analysis.
    Stewart KE; Cowan LD; Thompson DM; Sacra JC; Albrecht R
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1208-16. PubMed ID: 22092906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Time-dependent propensity score for assessing the effect of vaccine exposure on pregnancy outcomes through pregnancy exposure cohort studies.
    Xu R; Luo Y; Glynn R; Johnson D; Jones KL; Chambers C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2014 Mar; 11(3):3074-85. PubMed ID: 24625623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.