These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34270363)

  • 1. Pitfalls in Study Interpretation.
    Gelbard RB; Cripps MW
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2021 Aug; 22(6):646-650. PubMed ID: 34270363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitfalls and biases in the reporting and interpretation of the results of clinical trials.
    Parmar MK
    Lung Cancer; 1994 Mar; 10 Suppl 1():S143-50. PubMed ID: 8087503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias in surgical research.
    Paradis C
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
    Akobeng AK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.
    MacLehose RR; Reeves BC; Harvey IM; Sheldon TA; Russell IT; Black AM
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(34):1-154. PubMed ID: 11134917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applying propensity score methods in medical research: pitfalls and prospects.
    Luo Z; Gardiner JC; Bradley CJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2010 Oct; 67(5):528-54. PubMed ID: 20442340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
    Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It's All How You "Spin" It: Interpretive Bias in Research Findings in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Literature.
    Turrentine M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 129(2):239-242. PubMed ID: 28079777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How To Lie with Statistics and Figures.
    Parks J; Yeh DD
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2021 Aug; 22(6):611-619. PubMed ID: 34270365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Common errors in the design of orthopaedic studies.
    Bono CM; Tornetta P
    Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 16473355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An analysis of randomized controlled trials underpinning ST-elevation myocardial infarction management guidelines.
    Meyer C; Bowers A; Jaiswal D; Checketts J; Engheta M; Severns C; Cook S; Walters C; Vassar M
    Am J Emerg Med; 2019 Dec; 37(12):2229-2238. PubMed ID: 30940409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple uses of forest plots in presenting analysis results in health research: A Tutorial.
    Li G; Zeng J; Tian J; Levine MAH; Thabane L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():89-98. PubMed ID: 31589955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological issues in observational studies and non-randomized controlled trials in oncology in the era of big data.
    Tanaka S; Tanaka S; Kawakami K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 25589456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Fragility and Reliability of Conclusions of Anesthesia and Critical Care Randomized Trials With Statistically Significant Findings: A Systematic Review.
    Grolleau F; Collins GS; Smarandache A; Pirracchio R; Gakuba C; Boutron I; Busse JW; Devereaux PJ; Le Manach Y
    Crit Care Med; 2019 Mar; 47(3):456-462. PubMed ID: 30394920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.
    Norman G; Atkinson RA; Smith TA; Rowlands C; Rithalia AD; Crosbie EJ; Dumville JC
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 10(10):CD012234. PubMed ID: 29083473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confounding, causality, and confusion: the role of intermediate variables in interpreting observational studies in obstetrics.
    Ananth CV; Schisterman EF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 217(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 28427805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The architecture of clinical research (From the "Biostatistics and Epidemiology Lecture Series, Part 1").
    Stoller JK
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2017 Sep; 84(9 Suppl 2):e2-e9. PubMed ID: 28937357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.