These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34270390)

  • 21. A pragmatist approach to clinical ethics support: overcoming the perils of ethical pluralism.
    Inguaggiato G; Metselaar S; Porz R; Widdershoven G
    Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Sep; 22(3):427-438. PubMed ID: 30684092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a paediatric clinical ethics service.
    Jansen MA; Schlapbach LJ; Irving H
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2018 Nov; 54(11):1199-1205. PubMed ID: 29746009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multi-stakeholder perspectives in defining health services quality indicators and dimensions: a concept mapping based comparison for cataract care between Singapore and The Netherlands.
    Stolk-Vos A; De Korne D; Lamoureux E; Wai C; Busschbach JJ; van de Klundert JJ
    BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e046226. PubMed ID: 33827846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Qualitative Study of US Clinical Ethics Services: Objectives and Outcomes.
    McClimans L; Pressgrove G; Rhea J
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2016; 6(2):127-142. PubMed ID: 27763402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Defining the goals of ethics consultations: a necessary step for improving quality.
    Siegler M
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1992 Jan; 18(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 1549318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The doctor and the market: about the influence of market reforms on the professional medical ethics of surgeons and general practitioners in the Netherlands.
    Dwarswaard J; Hilhorst M; Trappenburg M
    Health Care Anal; 2011 Dec; 19(4):388-402. PubMed ID: 21267659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Developing clinical ethics support for an Australian Health Service: A survey of clinician's experiences and views.
    Fuscaldo G; Cadwell M; Wallis K; Fry L; Rogers M
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 30908109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Moral reasoning among Dutch community pharmacists: testing the applicability of the Australian Professional Ethics in Pharmacy test.
    Kruijtbosch M; Göttgens-Jansen W; Floor-Schreudering A; van Leeuwen E; Bouvy ML
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2019 Oct; 41(5):1323-1331. PubMed ID: 31254151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating newly acquired authority of nurse practitioners and physician assistants for reserved medical procedures in the Netherlands: a study protocol.
    De Bruijn-Geraets DP; Van Eijk-Hustings YJ; Vrijhoef HJ
    J Adv Nurs; 2014 Nov; 70(11):2673-82. PubMed ID: 24684631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identifying goals, roles and tasks of extended scope physiotherapy in Dutch primary care- an exploratory, qualitative multi-step study.
    Bastiaens F; Barten DJ; Veenhof C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):19. PubMed ID: 33407402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Organizing moral case deliberation experiences in two Dutch nursing homes.
    van der Dam SS; Abma TA; Molewijk AC; Kardol MJ; Schols JM; Widdershoven GA
    Nurs Ethics; 2011 May; 18(3):327-40. PubMed ID: 21558109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinimetric evaluation and clinical outcomes of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey.
    Geerse S; de Haan RJ; de Wolf MJF; Ebbens FA; van Spronsen E
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Jun; 17(1):105. PubMed ID: 31215443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Medical ethics research between theory and practice.
    ten Have HA; Lelie A
    Theor Med Bioeth; 1998 Jun; 19(3):263-76. PubMed ID: 9691788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality care and clinical ethics.
    Anzia DJ; La Puma J
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1992 Jan; 18(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 1549320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Developing an ethics support tool for dealing with dilemmas around client autonomy based on moral case deliberations.
    Hartman LA; Metselaar S; Molewijk AC; Edelbroek HM; Widdershoven GAM
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 30577790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Outcomes of moral case deliberation--the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD).
    Svantesson M; Karlsson J; Boitte P; Schildman J; Dauwerse L; Widdershoven G; Pedersen R; Huisman M; Molewijk B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 15():30. PubMed ID: 24712735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Ethics in clinical practice and in health care].
    Pintor S; Mennuni G; Fontana M; Nocchi S; Giarrusso P; Serio A; Fraioli A
    Clin Ter; 2015; 166(4):e276-80. PubMed ID: 26378763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multi-stakeholder perspectives in defining health-services quality in cataract care.
    Stolk-Vos AC; van de Klundert JJ; Maijers N; Zijlmans BLM; Busschbach JJV
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2017 Aug; 29(4):470-476. PubMed ID: 28498929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Theory and practice of clinical ethics support services: narrative and hermeneutical perspectives.
    Porz R; Landeweer E; Widdershoven G
    Bioethics; 2011 Sep; 25(7):354-60. PubMed ID: 21790689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Regulation and safety in healthcare: response to the report by the Netherlands Centre for Ethics and Health].
    Bal R; de Bovenkamp HV; Wallenburg I
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2019 Jul; 163():. PubMed ID: 31361421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.