167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34270480)
1. A Comparative Study of Multidetector Computed Tomography, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, and Computed Microtomography on Trabecular Bone Structures in the Human Mandible: An Ex Vivo Study.
Sarmento VA; de Oliveira Gonzalez TFL; Lopes RT; Novaes M; Borges SM; Rubira-Bullen IRF
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):552-556. PubMed ID: 34270480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible.
Van Dessel J; Huang Y; Depypere M; Rubira-Bullen I; Maes F; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130145. PubMed ID: 23833320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of bone microstructure in the wrist using cone-beam computed tomography.
Mys K; Stockmans F; Vereecke E; van Lenthe GH
Bone; 2018 Sep; 114():206-214. PubMed ID: 29909060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional evaluation of human jaw bone microarchitecture: correlation between the microarchitectural parameters of cone beam computed tomography and micro-computer tomography.
Kim JE; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Dec; 120(6):762-70. PubMed ID: 26548728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internal or in-scan validation: a method to assess CBCT and MSCT gray scales using a human cadaver.
Bujtár P; Simonovics J; Zombori G; Fejer Z; Szucs A; Bojtos A; Batista WO; Váradi K; Sándor GK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Jun; 117(6):768-79. PubMed ID: 24842449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective, semi-quantitative image quality analysis of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and MSCT in the diagnosis of distal radius fractures.
Lang H; Neubauer J; Fritz B; Spira EM; Strube J; Langer M; Kotter E
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4551-4561. PubMed ID: 27003138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of anterior and posterior trabecular bone microstructure of human mandible using cone-beam CT and micro CT.
Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Rahmat RA; Ismail SM; Aartman IHA
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):249. PubMed ID: 33964918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT.
Vandenberghe B; Luchsinger S; Hostens J; Dhoore E; Jacobs R;
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):466-74. PubMed ID: 22282512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the prediction of the trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters using dental cone-beam computed tomography.
He RT; Tu MG; Huang HL; Tsai MT; Wu J; Hsu JT
BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Jan; 19(1):10. PubMed ID: 30674282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of micro-CT and cone beam CT on the feasibility of assessing trabecular structures in mandibular condyle.
Liang X; Zhang Z; Gu J; Wang Z; Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J; Ma G; Ling H; Ma X
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160435. PubMed ID: 28350523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
Hirschinger V; Hanke S; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):152-60, 162-3. PubMed ID: 25744093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of maxillary trabecular microstructure as an indicator of implant stability by using 2 cone beam computed tomography systems and micro-computed tomography.
Kulah K; Gulsahi A; Kamburoğlu K; Geneci F; Ocak M; Celik HH; Ozen T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Mar; 127(3):247-256. PubMed ID: 30595501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure.
Hofmann E; Schmid M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Sep; 75(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 25158951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
Silva IM; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GM; Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM
Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(6):550-6. PubMed ID: 23184166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of mandibular bone microarchitecture between micro-CT and CBCT images.
Panmekiate S; Ngonphloy N; Charoenkarn T; Faruangsaeng T; Pauwels R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(5):20140322. PubMed ID: 25564887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep.
Muhammad AMA; Ibrahim N; Ahmad R; Asif MK; Radzi Z; Zaini ZM; Razak HRA
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 32041589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
