155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34271281)
1. Maximizing range of motion of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using design optimization techniques.
Elwell J; Athwal G; Willing R
J Biomech; 2021 Aug; 125():110602. PubMed ID: 34271281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterizing the trade-off between range of motion and stability of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Elwell JA; Athwal GS; Willing R
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2804-2813. PubMed ID: 34020003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjusting Implant Size and Position Can Improve Internal Rotation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Three-dimensional Computational Model.
Huish EG; Athwal GS; Neyton L; Walch G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 33044311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Oct; 26(10):1726-1731. PubMed ID: 28528016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study.
Arenas-Miquelez A; Murphy RJ; Rosa A; Caironi D; Zumstein MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):763-771. PubMed ID: 32763384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis.
Keener JD; Patterson BM; Orvets N; Aleem AW; Chamberlain AM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Feb; 27(2):339-349. PubMed ID: 29332666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mid-term comparative study between the glenoid and humerus lateralization designs for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: which lateralization design is better?
Lee HH; Park SE; Ji JH; Jun HS
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):290. PubMed ID: 37059977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant characteristics affect in vivo shoulder kinematics during multiplanar functional motions after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Como C; LeVasseur C; Kane G; Rai A; Munsch M; Gabrielli A; Hughes J; Anderst W; Lin A
J Biomech; 2022 Apr; 135():111050. PubMed ID: 35313249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice.
Werthel JD; Walch G; Vegehan E; Deransart P; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Valenti P
Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2349-2360. PubMed ID: 31254018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Humeral offset as a predictor of outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Carrazana-Suarez LF; Panico LC; Smolinski MP; Blake RJ; McCroskey MA; Sykes JB; Lin A
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jun; 31(6S):S158-S165. PubMed ID: 35378314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Humeral version in reverse shoulder arthroplasty affects impingement in activities of daily living.
Kontaxis A; Chen X; Berhouet J; Choi D; Wright T; Dines DM; Warren RF; Gulotta LV
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1073-1082. PubMed ID: 28162877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lateralized versus nonlateralized glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Nunes B; Linhares D; Costa F; Neves N; Claro R; Silva MR
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1700-1713. PubMed ID: 33160029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Application of a Novel Metric to Characterize Comprehensive Range of Motion of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Elwell JA; Athwal GS; Willing R
J Orthop Res; 2020 Apr; 38(4):880-887. PubMed ID: 31696954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years' follow-up.
Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Bessière C; Chelli M; Gauci MO; Lemmex DB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2111-2122. PubMed ID: 32505414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Boileau P; Farron A; Deransart P; Walch G
Int Orthop; 2018 Jun; 42(6):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 29492611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1-3: does the design make a difference?
Freislederer F; Toft F; Audigé L; Marzel A; Endell D; Scheibel M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):341-351. PubMed ID: 34450279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study.
Franceschetti E; Ranieri R; Giovanetti de Sanctis E; Palumbo A; Franceschi F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 31401130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of impingement-free range of motion of the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using three different implant models.
Kim SJ; Jang SW; Jung KH; Kim YS; Lee SJ; Yoo YS
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Jan; 24(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 30268356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical and radiographic impact of center of rotation lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Helmkamp JK; Bullock GS; Amilo NR; Guerrero EM; Ledbetter LS; Sell TC; Garrigues GE
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2099-2107. PubMed ID: 30340806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of critical shoulder angle, glenoid lateralization, and humeral inclination on range of movement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Lädermann A; Tay E; Collin P; Piotton S; Chiu CH; Michelet A; Charbonnier C
Bone Joint Res; 2019 Aug; 8(8):378-386. PubMed ID: 31537995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
