These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34271544)

  • 21. Establishment and Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway Tailored for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.
    Feng C; Zhang Y; Chong F; Yang M; Liu C; Liu L; Huang C; Huang C; Feng X; Wang X; Chu T; Zhou Y; Huang B
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 129():e317-e323. PubMed ID: 31132490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation.
    Zheng F; Cammisa FP; Sandhu HS; Girardi FP; Khan SN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):818-24. PubMed ID: 11935103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Safety and Efficacy of Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression in the Ambulatory Setting.
    Hirsch BP; Khechen B; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(8):E494-E499. PubMed ID: 30234800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Complications and Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Nonobese and Obese Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.
    Park P; Wang MY; Nguyen S; Mundis GM; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Fessler R; Eastlack RK; Chou D; Deviren V; Nunley PD; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV;
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Mar; 87():55-60. PubMed ID: 26724613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
    Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Primary MIS TLIF and MIS TLIF With Revision Decompression.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Patel DV; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Iyer S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan; 44(2):150-156. PubMed ID: 30562332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m
    Krüger MT; Naseri Y; Hohenhaus M; Hubbe U; Scholz C; Klingler JH
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Mar; 178():82-85. PubMed ID: 30739072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Apr; 20(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 20927557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does minimally invasive spine surgery reduce the rate of perioperative medical complications? A retrospective single-center experience of 1435 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries.
    Altshuler M; Mueller K; MacConnell A; Wirth P; Sandhu F; Voyadzis JM
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Jan; 30(1):122-127. PubMed ID: 32700125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Bovonratwet P; Samuel AM; Mok JK; Vaishnav AS; Morse KW; Song J; Steinhaus ME; Jordan YJ; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Nov; 47(21):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 35867599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Li F; Li C; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Wang H; Yu Y; Cheng L
    BMC Surg; 2020 May; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32398125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does obesity affect long-term outcomes of extreme lateral interbody fusion with posterior stabilization?
    Changoor S; Dunn C; Coban D; Parray A; Sinha K; Hwang KS; Faloon M; Emami A
    Spine J; 2021 Aug; 21(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 33744435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of bilateral versus unilateral decompression incision of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Zhao Y; Zhu Y; Zhang H; Wang C; He S; Gu G
    Int Orthop; 2018 Dec; 42(12):2835-2842. PubMed ID: 29754188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of minimally invasive decompression alone versus minimally invasive short-segment fusion in the setting of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Echt M; Bakare AA; Varela JR; Platt A; Abdul Sami M; Molenda J; Kerolus M; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Sep; 39(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 37327145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surgical and Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery in an Unselected Patient Cohort of a Spinal Care Unit.
    Senker W; Gruber A; Gmeiner M; Stefanits H; Sander K; Rössler P; Pflugmacher R
    Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 10(3):192-197. PubMed ID: 30152613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: comparison between primary and revision surgery.
    Kang MS; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():919248. PubMed ID: 24949483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
    Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors affecting length of stay after elective posterior lumbar spine surgery: a multivariate analysis.
    Gruskay JA; Fu M; Bohl DD; Webb ML; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1188-95. PubMed ID: 24184639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Li Y; Cheng X; Chen B
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 36895012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Indirect decompression and reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis does not result in higher rates of immediate and long term complications.
    Januszewski J; Beckman JM; Bach K; Vivas AC; Uribe JS
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 45():218-222. PubMed ID: 28765063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.