149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3427167)
1. Trimmed logit method for estimating the ED50 in quantal bioassay.
Sanathanan LP; Gade ET; Shipkowitz NL
Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 3427167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maximum likelihood vs. minimum chi-square.
Mantel N
Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):777-83. PubMed ID: 4074827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A dose-response model for teratological experiments involving quantal responses.
Rai K; Van Ryzin J
Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 4005367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the species accumulation curve using mixtures.
Mao CX; Colwell RK; Chang J
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):433-41. PubMed ID: 16011689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interval estimation of the LD50 based on an up-and-down experiment.
Choi SC
Biometrics; 1990 Jun; 46(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 2364133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A general noninteractive multiple toxicity model including probit, logit, and Weibull transformations.
Christensen ER; Chen CY
Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):711-25. PubMed ID: 4074820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpreting statistical evidence with empirical likelihood functions.
Zhang Z
Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):710-20. PubMed ID: 19650056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Asymptotic confidence bands for generalized nonlinear regression models.
Cox C; Ma G
Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 7766770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose-time-response cumulative multinomial generalized linear model.
Chen DG
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):173-85. PubMed ID: 17219762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concomitant information in bioassay and semi-parametric estimation.
Kim PT; Lee CH
Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(9):1421-33. PubMed ID: 15568193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A generalization of the probit and logit methods for dose response curves.
Prentice RL
Biometrics; 1976 Dec; 32(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 1009225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kernel estimates of dose response.
Staniswalis JG; Cooper V
Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1103-19. PubMed ID: 3233249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantit analysis: a quantal assay refinement.
Copenhaver TW; Mielke PW
Biometrics; 1977 Mar; 33(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 843572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small-sample confidence limits for parameters under inequality constraints with application to quantal bioassay.
Morris MD
Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1083-92. PubMed ID: 3233247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choice of number of doses for maximum likelihood estimation of the ED50 for quantal dose-response data.
Müller HG; Schmitt T
Biometrics; 1990 Mar; 46(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 2350566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semi-parametric estimation in failure time mixture models.
Taylor JM
Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):899-907. PubMed ID: 7548707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parametric and non-parametric prediction intervals based phase II control charts for repeated bioassay data.
Hothorn LA; Gerhard D; Hofmann M
Biologicals; 2009 Oct; 37(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 19647449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Bayesian approach to the analysis of quantal bioassay studies using nonparametric mixture models.
Fronczyk K; Kottas A
Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 24354490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of quantal dose response of drugs by the Spearman-Karber method: a computer program written in BASIC.
Fung KP; Wong TW
J Singapore Paediatr Soc; 1989; 31(3-4):129-32. PubMed ID: 2638718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A statistical test of compatibility of data sets to a common dose-response model.
Stiteler WM; Knauf LA; Hertzberg RC; Schoeny RS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 18(3):392-402. PubMed ID: 8128001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
