155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34271832)
1. Reference Case Methods for Expert Elicitation in Health Care Decision Making.
Bojke L; Soares MO; Claxton K; Colson A; Fox A; Jackson C; Jankovic D; Morton A; Sharples LD; Taylor A
Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):182-193. PubMed ID: 34271832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing a reference protocol for structured expert elicitation in health-care decision-making: a mixed-methods study.
Bojke L; Soares M; Claxton K; Colson A; Fox A; Jackson C; Jankovic D; Morton A; Sharples L; Taylor A
Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jun; 25(37):1-124. PubMed ID: 34105510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Informing Reimbursement Decisions Using Cost-Effectiveness Modelling: A Guide to the Process of Generating Elicited Priors to Capture Model Uncertainties.
Bojke L; Grigore B; Jankovic D; Peters J; Soares M; Stein K
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):867-877. PubMed ID: 28616775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():85. PubMed ID: 27456844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EXPLICIT: a feasibility study of remote expert elicitation in health technology assessment.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Sep; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28870196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance-Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation.
Peel A; Jenks M; Choudhury M; Lovett R; Rejon-Parrilla JC; Sims A; Craig J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2018 Dec; 16(6):819-836. PubMed ID: 30073485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.
Morgan MG
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 May; 111(20):7176-84. PubMed ID: 24821779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. USING EXPERT OPINION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A GUIDELINE REVIEW.
Hunger T; Schnell-Inderst P; Sahakyan N; Siebert U
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(3):131-9. PubMed ID: 27502308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.
Soares MO; Sharples L; Morton A; Claxton K; Bojke L
Value Health; 2018 Jun; 21(6):715-723. PubMed ID: 29909877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science.
Martin TG; Burgman MA; Fidler F; Kuhnert PM; Low-Choy S; McBride M; Mengersen K
Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 22280323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eliciting uncertainty for complex parameters in model-based economic evaluations: quantifying a temporal change in the treatment effect.
Jankovic D; Payne K; Kanaan M; Bojke L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Feb; 38(1):e21. PubMed ID: 35177145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methods to elicit experts' beliefs over uncertain quantities: application to a cost effectiveness transition model of negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulceration.
Soares MO; Bojke L; Dumville J; Iglesias C; Cullum N; Claxton K
Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(19):2363-80. PubMed ID: 21748773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure.
Knol AB; Slottje P; van der Sluijs JP; Lebret E
Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():19. PubMed ID: 20420657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a practical approach to expert elicitation for randomised controlled trials with missing health outcomes: Application to the IMPROVE trial.
Mason AJ; Gomes M; Grieve R; Ulug P; Powell JT; Carpenter J
Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28675302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods to elicit probability distributions from experts: a systematic review of reported practice in health technology assessment.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Nov; 31(11):991-1003. PubMed ID: 24105473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing the Elicitation Burden and the Richness of Expert Input When Quantifying Discrete Bayesian Networks.
Barons MJ; Mascaro S; Hanea AM
Risk Anal; 2022 Jun; 42(6):1196-1234. PubMed ID: 34146431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health Opportunity Costs: Assessing the Implications of Uncertainty Using Elicitation Methods with Experts.
Soares MO; Sculpher MJ; Claxton K
Med Decis Making; 2020 May; 40(4):448-459. PubMed ID: 32441558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Best-worst scaling to assess the most important barriers and facilitators for the use of health technology assessment in Austria.
Feig C; Cheung KL; Hiligsmann M; Evers SMAA; Simon J; Mayer S
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2018 Apr; 18(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 28862060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elicitation of quantitative data from a heterogeneous expert panel: formal process and application in animal health.
Van der Fels-Klerx IH; Goossens LH; Saatkamp HW; Horst SH
Risk Anal; 2002 Feb; 22(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 12017363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
