166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34272867)
1. Test-Retest Reliability of Remote ImPACT Administration.
Netzel L; Moran R; Hopfe D; Salvatore AP; Brown W; Murray NG
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Feb; 37(2):449-456. PubMed ID: 34272867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimal Detectable Change for the ImPACT Test Administered Remotely.
Quigley KG; Taylor MR; Hopfe D; Pavilionis P; Murray NG
J Athl Train; 2023 Nov; 58(11-12):981-986. PubMed ID: 36395365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.
Brett BL; Solomon GS
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 39(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 27585635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term test-retest reliability of the ImPACT in healthy young athletes.
O'Brien AM; Casey JE; Salmon RM
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2018; 7(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 28631965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-retest, retest, and retest: Growth curve models of repeat testing with Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).
Maerlender AC; Masterson CJ; James TD; Beckwith J; Brolinson PG; Crisco J; Duma S; Flashman LA; Greenwald R; Rowson S; Wilcox B; McAllister TW
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Oct; 38(8):869-74. PubMed ID: 27266563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes.
MacDonald J; Duerson D
Clin J Sport Med; 2015 Jul; 25(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND RELIABLE CHANGE INDEX OF MOBILE APPLICATION NEUROCOGNITIVE TEST AMONG MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETES.
Hashida K; Lee J; Furutani TM; Tsushima W; Tamura K
J Athl Train; 2023 Jul; 2023(preprint):0. PubMed ID: 37459377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of VOMS, SCAT3, and ImPACT Baseline Evaluations for Acute Concussion Identification in Collegiate Athletes: Findings From the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium.
Ferris LM; Kontos AP; Eagle SR; Elbin RJ; Collins MW; Mucha A; McAllister TW; Broglio SP; McCrea M; Pasquina PF; Port NL
Am J Sports Med; 2022 Mar; 50(4):1106-1119. PubMed ID: 35179972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rates and Predictors of Invalid Baseline Test Performance in High School and Collegiate Athletes for 3 Computerized Neurocognitive Tests: ANAM, Axon Sports, and ImPACT.
Nelson LD; Pfaller AY; Rein LE; McCrea MA
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):2018-26. PubMed ID: 26059178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Baseline Neurocognitive Performance and Clearance for Athletes to Return to Contact.
Asken BM; Clugston JR; Snyder AR; Bauer RM
J Athl Train; 2017 Jan; 52(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 27905859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-reported history of seizure and baseline neurocognitive test performance in student-athletes: an initial investigation.
Zalneraitis BH; Yengo-Kahn AM; Pawlukiewicz AJ; Solomon GS
Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Nov; 45(4):470-474. PubMed ID: 28838286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age and test setting affect the prevalence of invalid baseline scores on neurocognitive tests.
Lichtenstein JD; Moser RS; Schatz P
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 42(2):479-84. PubMed ID: 24243771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance.
Schatz P; Kelley T; Ott SD; Solomon GS; Elbin RJ; Higgins K; Moser RS
J Athl Train; 2014; 49(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 25162778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Test Environment, Age, Sex, and Sport on Baseline Computerized Neurocognitive Test Performance.
French J; Huber P; McShane J; Holland CL; Elbin RJ; Kontos AP
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Nov; 47(13):3263-3269. PubMed ID: 31609635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of baseline and post-concussion ImPACT test scores in young athletes with stimulant-treated and untreated ADHD.
Gardner RM; Yengo-Kahn A; Bonfield CM; Solomon GS
Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Feb; 45(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 27736285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Examination of Adolescent Athletes and Nonathletes on Baseline Neuropsychological Test Scores.
Tomczyk CP; Mormile M; Wittenberg MS; Langdon JL; Hunt TN
J Athl Train; 2018 Apr; 53(4):404-409. PubMed ID: 29543036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supervision and computerized neurocognitive baseline test performance in high school athletes: an initial investigation.
Kuhn AW; Solomon GS
J Athl Train; 2014; 49(6):800-5. PubMed ID: 25299577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relation Between Testing Environment and Baseline Performance in Child and Adolescent Concussion Assessment.
Vaughan CG; Gerst EH; Sady MD; Newman JB; Gioia GA
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jul; 42(7):1716-23. PubMed ID: 24787043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Test-retest reliability of the neurotracker compared to the impact test for the management of mild traumatic brain injuries during two consecutive university sport seasons.
Deschamps A; Giguère-Lemieux É; Fait P; Corbin-Berrigan LA
Brain Inj; 2022 Jul; 36(8):977-984. PubMed ID: 35950219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
