328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34272955)
1. Are synthetic clinical notes useful for real natural language processing tasks: A case study on clinical entity recognition.
Li J; Zhou Y; Jiang X; Natarajan K; Pakhomov SV; Liu H; Xu H
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Sep; 28(10):2193-2201. PubMed ID: 34272955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DeIDNER Corpus: Annotation of Clinical Discharge Summary Notes for Named Entity Recognition Using BRAT Tool.
Syed M; Al-Shukri S; Syed S; Sexton K; Greer ML; Zozus M; Bhattacharyya S; Prior F
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():432-436. PubMed ID: 34042780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of pre-trained language models for named entity recognition in clinical trial eligibility criteria from multiple corpora.
Li J; Wei Q; Ghiasvand O; Chen M; Lobanov V; Weng C; Xu H
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Sep; 22(Suppl 3):235. PubMed ID: 36068551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extracting comprehensive clinical information for breast cancer using deep learning methods.
Zhang X; Zhang Y; Zhang Q; Ren Y; Qiu T; Ma J; Sun Q
Int J Med Inform; 2019 Dec; 132():103985. PubMed ID: 31627032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive study of named entity recognition in Chinese clinical text.
Lei J; Tang B; Lu X; Gao K; Jiang M; Xu H
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(5):808-14. PubMed ID: 24347408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving large language models for clinical named entity recognition via prompt engineering.
Hu Y; Chen Q; Du J; Peng X; Keloth VK; Zuo X; Zhou Y; Li Z; Jiang X; Lu Z; Roberts K; Xu H
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38281112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A large language model-based generative natural language processing framework fine-tuned on clinical notes accurately extracts headache frequency from electronic health records.
Chiang CC; Luo M; Dumkrieger G; Trivedi S; Chen YC; Chao CJ; Schwedt TJ; Sarker A; Banerjee I
Headache; 2024 Apr; 64(4):400-409. PubMed ID: 38525734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task definition, annotated dataset, and supervised natural language processing models for symptom extraction from unstructured clinical notes.
Steinkamp JM; Bala W; Sharma A; Kantrowitz JJ
J Biomed Inform; 2020 Feb; 102():103354. PubMed ID: 31838210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overview of the First Natural Language Processing Challenge for Extracting Medication, Indication, and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Record Notes (MADE 1.0).
Jagannatha A; Liu F; Liu W; Yu H
Drug Saf; 2019 Jan; 42(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 30649735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Hybrid Model for Family History Information Identification and Relation Extraction: Development and Evaluation of an End-to-End Information Extraction System.
Kim Y; Heider PM; Lally IR; Meystre SM
JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Apr; 9(4):e22797. PubMed ID: 33885370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study of active learning methods for named entity recognition in clinical text.
Chen Y; Lasko TA; Mei Q; Denny JC; Xu H
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Dec; 58():11-18. PubMed ID: 26385377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sample Size Considerations for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Named Entity Recognition Tasks: Methodological Study.
Majdik ZP; Graham SS; Shiva Edward JC; Rodriguez SN; Karnes MS; Jensen JT; Barbour JB; Rousseau JF
JMIR AI; 2024 May; 3():e52095. PubMed ID: 38875593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study of deep learning approaches for medication and adverse drug event extraction from clinical text.
Wei Q; Ji Z; Li Z; Du J; Wang J; Xu J; Xiang Y; Tiryaki F; Wu S; Zhang Y; Tao C; Xu H
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Jan; 27(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 31135882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Privacy-preserving mimic models for clinical named entity recognition in French.
Bannour N; Wajsbürt P; Rance B; Tannier X; Névéol A
J Biomed Inform; 2022 Jun; 130():104073. PubMed ID: 35427797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Various criteria in the evaluation of biomedical named entity recognition.
Tsai RT; Wu SH; Chou WC; Lin YC; He D; Hsiang J; Sung TY; Hsu WL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():92. PubMed ID: 16504116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Med7: A transferable clinical natural language processing model for electronic health records.
Kormilitzin A; Vaci N; Liu Q; Nevado-Holgado A
Artif Intell Med; 2021 Aug; 118():102086. PubMed ID: 34412834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing.
Wang Y; Liu S; Afzal N; Rastegar-Mojarad M; Wang L; Shen F; Kingsbury P; Liu H
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Nov; 87():12-20. PubMed ID: 30217670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synthetic data for annotation and extraction of family history information from clinical text.
Brekke PH; Rama T; Pilán I; Nytrø Ø; Øvrelid L
J Biomed Semantics; 2021 Jul; 12(1):11. PubMed ID: 34261535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negation recognition in clinical natural language processing using a combination of the NegEx algorithm and a convolutional neural network.
Argüello-González G; Aquino-Esperanza J; Salvador D; Bretón-Romero R; Del Río-Bermudez C; Tello J; Menke S
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Oct; 23(1):216. PubMed ID: 37833661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study of deep learning methods for de-identification of clinical notes in cross-institute settings.
Yang X; Lyu T; Li Q; Lee CY; Bian J; Hogan WR; Wu Y
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Dec; 19(Suppl 5):232. PubMed ID: 31801524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
