238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34272985)
1. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Duncombe SL; Voss C; Harris KC
J Hypertens; 2017 Feb; 35(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 27870656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park SH; Park YS
Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of automated blood pressure measurements in the presence of atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clark CE; McDonagh STJ; McManus RJ
J Hum Hypertens; 2019 May; 33(5):352-364. PubMed ID: 30631126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the Measurement of Blood Pressure by Automatic Monitor in the South American Pediatric Population Accurate? SAYCARE Study.
Araújo-Moura K; De Moraes ACF; Forkert ECO; Berg G; Cucato GG; Forjaz CLM; Moliterno P; Gaitan-Charry D; Delgado CA; González-Gil EM; Moreno LA; Carvalho HB; Torres-Leal FL
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2018 Mar; 26 Suppl 1():S41-S46. PubMed ID: 29464919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A survey to gauge confidence of Indian clinicians on three primary devices for blood pressure measurement.
Kumar R; Sahani AK; Wander GS
Blood Press Monit; 2021 Jun; 26(3):196-199. PubMed ID: 33470647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study.
Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R;
J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auscl-D: a mercury-free digital auscultatory sphygmomanometer.
Kumar V; Kumar R; Kumar M; Wander GS; Sahani A
J Med Eng Technol; 2021 Nov; 45(8):656-663. PubMed ID: 34254871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
