241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34272985)
21. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the automated non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTRU) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population.
Mattu GS; Heran BS; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15021077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer?
Pickering TG
Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 12604932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring].
Cao Q; Li D; Yu W; Guo Q; Zhao L; Yu D; Wang Y
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2016 Sep; 45(5):758-765. PubMed ID: 29903127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers.
Arosio E; Zannoni M
Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun; 41(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10479914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.
Eliasdottir SB; Steinthorsdottir SD; Indridason OS; Palsson R; Edvardsson VO
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 Nov; 15(11):776-83. PubMed ID: 24112661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the accuracy and errors of blood pressure measured by 2 types of non-mercury sphygmomanometers in an epidemiological survey.
Choi S; Kim YM; Shin J; Lim YH; Choi SY; Choi BY; Oh KW; Lee HM; Woo KJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e10851. PubMed ID: 29923975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Home blood pressure measurement: validation of the Braun BP 2550 (UG) monitor according to the ESH International Protocol.
Nolly H; Romero M; Nolly A; Osso P; Reinoso O; Nolly M
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 15021079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An Assessment of the Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Monitors When Used in Device Owners.
Ringrose JS; Polley G; McLean D; Thompson A; Morales F; Padwal R
Am J Hypertens; 2017 Jul; 30(7):683-689. PubMed ID: 28430848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of patient simulators to characterize the repeatability and reproducibility of automated oscillometric blood pressure monitors.
Sarhrani EM; Gilmore TB; Lamontagne AS; Harris LB; Kellett JS; Sweeney MP; Navas TI; Vesnovsky O; Ho C; Herbertson LH
Blood Press Monit; 2018 Oct; 23(5):225-229. PubMed ID: 29771693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Reliability of an automatic monitor for blood pressure measurement].
Cardona-Müller D; Grover-Páez F; Guzmán-Saldivar V; Alanis-Sánchez GA; Murguía-Soto C; Totsuka-Sutto SE; Quezada-Fernández P; Macías-Chumacera A; Cardona-Muñoz EG; Ramos-Becerra CG
Rev Med Chil; 2018 Feb; 146(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 29999155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using semi-automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement in diabetic patients and their offspring.
Kuo CS; Hwu CM; Kwok CF; Hsiao LC; Weih MJ; Lee SH; Ho LT
J Diabetes Complications; 2000; 14(5):288-93. PubMed ID: 11113693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia.
Natarajan P; Shennan AH; Penny J; Halligan AW; de Swiet M; Anthony J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1203-10. PubMed ID: 10561646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of A&D UA-778 blood pressure monitor in children.
Narogan MV; Narogan MI; Syutkina EV
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 19938323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of the Wellvii VitalDetect blood pressure monitor in general population according to the International Standardization Organization 81060-2:2018.
Li LY; Chen JF; Bing S; Liu K; Cheng R; Wan Y
Blood Press Monit; 2024 Apr; 29(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 37997441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
