186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34273053)
1. Multitask machine learning models for predicting lipophilicity (logP) in the SAMPL7 challenge.
Lenselink EB; Stouten PFW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Aug; 35(8):901-909. PubMed ID: 34273053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A deep learning approach for the blind logP prediction in SAMPL6 challenge.
Prasad S; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):535-542. PubMed ID: 32002779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. COSMO-RS predictions of logP in the SAMPL7 blind challenge.
Warnau J; Wichmann K; Reinisch J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):813-818. PubMed ID: 34125358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting partition coefficients for the SAMPL7 physical property challenge using the ClassicalGSG method.
Donyapour N; Dickson A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):819-830. PubMed ID: 34181200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. COSMO-RS based predictions for the SAMPL6 logP challenge.
Loschen C; Reinisch J; Klamt A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):385-392. PubMed ID: 31773462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantum chemical predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients applied to the SAMPL6 logP blind challenge.
Jones MR; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):485-493. PubMed ID: 32002778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SAMPL7 blind challenge: quantum-mechanical prediction of partition coefficients and acid dissociation constants for small drug-like molecules.
Fındık BK; Haslak ZP; Arslan E; Aviyente V
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):841-851. PubMed ID: 34164769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stacking Gaussian processes to improve [Formula: see text] predictions in the SAMPL7 challenge.
Raddi RM; Voelz VA
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Sep; 35(9):953-961. PubMed ID: 34363562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of molecular representations for lipophilicity quantitative structure-property relationships with results from the SAMPL6 logP Prediction Challenge.
Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):523-534. PubMed ID: 31933037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of log P, pK
Bergazin TD; Tielker N; Zhang Y; Mao J; Gunner MR; Francisco K; Ballatore C; Kast SM; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):771-802. PubMed ID: 34169394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overview of the SAMPL6 pK
Işık M; Rustenburg AS; Rizzi A; Gunner MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Feb; 35(2):131-166. PubMed ID: 33394238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SAMPL7 physical property prediction from EC-RISM theory.
Tielker N; Güssregen S; Kast SM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Aug; 35(8):933-941. PubMed ID: 34278539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LogP prediction performance with the SMD solvation model and the M06 density functional family for SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge molecules.
Guan D; Lui R; Matthews S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):511-522. PubMed ID: 31939103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantum-mechanical property prediction of solvated drug molecules: what have we learned from a decade of SAMPL blind prediction challenges?
Tielker N; Eberlein L; Hessler G; Schmidt KF; Güssregen S; Kast SM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Apr; 35(4):453-472. PubMed ID: 33079358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SAMPL6 logP challenge: machine learning and quantum mechanical approaches.
Patel P; Kuntz DM; Jones MR; Brooks BR; Wilson AK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):495-510. PubMed ID: 32002780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of logP and logD correction models trained with public and proprietary data sets.
Aliagas I; Gobbi A; Lee ML; Sellers BD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Mar; 36(3):253-262. PubMed ID: 35359246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting Melting Points of Organic Molecules: Applications to Aqueous Solubility Prediction Using the General Solubility Equation.
McDonagh JL; van Mourik T; Mitchell JB
Mol Inform; 2015 Nov; 34(11-12):715-24. PubMed ID: 27491032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chemprop: A Machine Learning Package for Chemical Property Prediction.
Heid E; Greenman KP; Chung Y; Li SC; Graff DE; Vermeire FH; Wu H; Green WH; McGill CJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Jan; 64(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 38147829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accurate Physical Property Predictions via Deep Learning.
Hou Y; Wang S; Bai B; Chan HCS; Yuan S
Molecules; 2022 Mar; 27(5):. PubMed ID: 35268770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple linear regression models for predicting the n‑octanol/water partition coefficients in the SAMPL7 blind challenge.
Lopez K; Pinheiro S; Zamora WJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Aug; 35(8):923-931. PubMed ID: 34251523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
