These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34274122)

  • 1. New AO/OTA classification of proximal femur fractures; Methodological issues on inter and intra observer reliability.
    Sabour S
    Injury; 2021 Oct; 52(10):3181. PubMed ID: 34274122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the new AO/OTA classification of proximal femur fractures.
    Chan G; Hughes K; Barakat A; Edres K; da Assuncao R; Page P; Dawe E
    Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1434-1437. PubMed ID: 33097201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral neck fracture: the reliability of radiologic classifications.
    Cazzato G; Oliva MS; Masci G; Vitiello R; Smimmo A; Matrangolo MR; Palmacci O; D'Adamio S; Ziranu A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 22(Suppl 2):1063. PubMed ID: 35078436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.
    Pervez H; Parker MJ; Pryor GA; Lutchman L; Chirodian N
    Injury; 2002 Oct; 33(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 12213423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Inter and Intra-Observer Reliability of the AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures and the Device Choice (DHS, PFNA, and DCS) of Fixations.
    Zarie M; Mohamoud MF; Farhoud AR; Bagheri N; Khan FMY; Heshmatifar M; Klantar H
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2020 Sep; 30(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 33911837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
    Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
    Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
    İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
    Wæver D; Madsen ML; Rölfing JHD; Borris LC; Henriksen M; Nagel LL; Thorninger R
    Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
    Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of a three-dimensional classification system for intertrochanteric fracture using computed tomography.
    Wada K; Mikami H; Toki S; Amari R; Takai M; Sairyo K
    Injury; 2020 Nov; 51(11):2682-2685. PubMed ID: 32718752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.
    Wennergren D; Ekholm C; Sundfeldt M; Karlsson J; Bhandari M; Möller M
    Injury; 2016 Feb; 47(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 26620119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the AO classification of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur.
    Blundell CM; Parker MJ; Pryor GA; Hopkinson-Woolley J; Bhonsle SS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Jul; 80(4):679-83. PubMed ID: 9699837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Klaber I; Carmona M; Palma J; Campos M; Yurac R
    Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 26653269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoral fracture classification in the Swedish Fracture Register - a validity study.
    Knutsson SB; Wennergren D; Bojan A; Ekelund J; Möller M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):197. PubMed ID: 31068172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification.
    Yin B; He Y; Wang D; Zhou J
    Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 33280893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic literature review of tibial plateau fractures: What classifications are used and how reliable and useful are they?
    Millar SC; Arnold JB; Thewlis D; Fraysse F; Solomon LB
    Injury; 2018 Mar; 49(3):473-490. PubMed ID: 29395219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.
    van Embden D; Rhemrev SJ; Meylaerts SA; Roukema GR
    Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 19906370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there any purpose in classifying subtrochanteric fractures? The reproducibility of four classification systems.
    Guyver PM; McCarthy MJ; Jain NP; Poulter RJ; McAllen CJ; Keenan J
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 May; 24(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 23412146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classifying intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur: does experience matter?
    Fung W; Jonsson A; Buhren V; Bhandari M
    Med Princ Pract; 2007; 16(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 17409754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is surgeons' experience important on intra- and inter-observer reliability of classifications used for adult femoral neck fracture?
    Turgut A; Kumbaracı M; Kalenderer Ö; İlyas G; Bacaksız T; Karapınar L
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016 Dec; 50(6):601-605. PubMed ID: 27889406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.