211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34274287)
1. Computed tomography assessment of mandibular morphologic changes and the inferior mandibular border defect after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Takayama A; Saito Y; Sato M; Baba N; Kimura Y; Fujimoto K; Koizumi M; Hotta A; Iguchi R; Yoshizawa K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Nov; 132(5):496-505. PubMed ID: 34274287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of condylar surface CT values related to condylar height reduction after orthognathic surgery.
Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Saito Y; Takayama A; Baba N; Kimura Y; Koizumi M; Fujimoto K; Iguchi R; Sato M; Osada AH; Moroi A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 49(8):639-648. PubMed ID: 33994298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between occlusal force and condylar morphology in class II and III after bi-maxillary osteotomy.
Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Tsutsui T; Hotta A; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y; Sato M; Baba N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2103-2107. PubMed ID: 30420148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Three-dimensional changes in condylar position in skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy].
Huang JQ; Huang Z; Wu J; Wang YJ; Sang T; Liu F; Zheng Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):649-655. PubMed ID: 31606999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of lateral pterygoid muscle and temporomandibular joint disc after Le Fort I osteotomy with and without intentional pterygoid plate fracture and sagittal split ramus osteotomy in class II and class III patients.
Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Takayama A; Baba N; Kimura Y; Koizumi M; Fujimoto K; Iguchi R; Ono S; Osada AH; Moroi A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 34598864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in Condylar Position Within 12 Months After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With and Without Le Fort I Osteotomy by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Han Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 80(1):162-173. PubMed ID: 34547267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in cross-sectional measurements of masseter, medial pterygoid muscles, ramus, condyle and occlusal force after bi-maxillary surgery.
Takayama A; Ueki K; Moroi A; Tsutsui T; Saito Y; Sato M; Yoshizawa K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 30691943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in the position of the condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular retrusion and protrusion: a new condyle: fossa matching concept.
Yin Q; Bi R; Abotaleb B; Jiang N; Li Y; Zhu S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 57(10):1086-1091. PubMed ID: 31623933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of temporomandibular joint and ramus morphology between class II and class III cases before and after bi-maxillary osteotomy.
Iguchi R; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Tsutsui T; Hotta A; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y; Sato M; Baba N; Ueki K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2002-2009. PubMed ID: 29046240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on temporomandibular joint symptom and condylar position in patients with skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion by cone beam computed tomography].
Guo ML; Huang Z; Wang C; Wang YJ
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 38(5):519-524. PubMed ID: 33085235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional evaluation of positional change of the condyle after mandibular setback by means of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Lee W; Park JU
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Sep; 94(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 12324783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the mandibular ramus fracture line after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Muto T; Takahashi M; Akizuki K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):e648-52. PubMed ID: 23078827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.
Chen S; Lei J; Wang X; Fu KY; Farzad P; Yi B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1956-66. PubMed ID: 23973047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of postoperative condylar changes after unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional analysis.
Kang HS; Han JJ; Jung S; Kook MS; Park HJ; Oh HK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Nov; 130(5):505-514. PubMed ID: 32675028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of treatment with unilateral mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy and maxillary osteotomy in patients with condylar osteochondroma and mandibular asymmetry: A retrospective case series.
Xia L; Jiang W; Yao K; Wei S; Yu W; Lu X
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 51(2):123-129. PubMed ID: 36803856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement.
Komori H; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Kato Y; Fujisawa A; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI changes in the temporomandibular joint following mandibular setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation.
Takahara N; Kabasawa Y; Sato M; Tetsumura A; Kurabayashi T; Omura K
Cranio; 2017 Jan; 35(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 27077250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy based on position of mandibular canal and morphology of mandibular angle.
Yamauchi K; Takahashi T; Kaneuji T; Nogami S; Yamamoto N; Miyamoto I; Yamashita Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 21549489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of border movement of the mandible before and after orthognathic surgery using a kinesiograph.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Takayama A; Tsutsui T; Saito Y; Yoshizawa K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 May; 48(5):477-482. PubMed ID: 32229178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]