These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34274502)

  • 1. Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.
    Loenen ACY; Peters MJM; Bevers RTJ; Schaffrath C; van Haver E; Cuijpers VMJI; Rademakers T; van Rietbergen B; Willems PC; Arts JJ
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):174-182. PubMed ID: 34274502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
    McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.
    Laratta JL; Vivace BJ; López-Peña M; Guzón FM; Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A; Jorge-Mora A; Villar-Liste RM; Pino-Lopez L; Lukyanchuk A; Taghizadeh EA; Pino-Minguez J
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1016-1027. PubMed ID: 34906741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
    Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) titanium composite interbody spacer in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model: biomechanical, microcomputed tomographic, and histologic analyses.
    McGilvray KC; Waldorff EI; Easley J; Seim HB; Zhang N; Linovitz RJ; Ryaby JT; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1907-1916. PubMed ID: 28751242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.
    Fogel G; Martin N; Lynch K; Pelletier MH; Wills D; Wang T; Walsh WR; Williams GM; Malik J; Peng Y; Jekir M
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1028-1037. PubMed ID: 35017054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
    Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choice of Spinal Interbody Fusion Cage Material and Design Influences Subsidence and Osseointegration Performance.
    Fogel G; Martin N; Williams GM; Unger J; Yee-Yanagishita C; Pelletier M; Walsh W; Peng Y; Jekir M
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e626-e634. PubMed ID: 35346883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Long-term Follow-Up of n-HA PA66 Cage and PEEK Cage of Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multi-level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: A Stepwise Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Li Q; Gao Q; Wang L; Liu L; Yang H; Song Y
    Orthop Surg; 2024 Jan; 16(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 37953456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Promotion of higher rates of early fusion using activated titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in adults undergoing 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a randomized controlled trial.
    Toop N; Dhaliwal J; Gifford CS; Gibbs D; Keister A; Miracle S; Forghani R; Grossbach AJ; Farhadi HF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 37542447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional trajectory screw fixation or cortical bone trajectory screw fixation: A comparative study between the polyetheretherketone cage and the same shape titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage.
    Sakaura H; Ikegami D; Fujimori T; Sugiura T; Yamada S; Mukai Y
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 209():106945. PubMed ID: 34555798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 3D-printed titanium-alloy, standard titanium-alloy, and PEEK interbody spacers in an ovine model.
    Van Horn MR; Beard R; Wang W; Cunningham BW; Mullinix KP; Allall M; Bucklen BS
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2097-2103. PubMed ID: 34029756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of autologous bone-cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis.
    Zhu H; Zhong W; Zhang P; Liu X; Huang J; Liu F; Li J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):379. PubMed ID: 32534573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Undercut macrostructure topography on and within an interbody cage improves biomechanical stability and interbody fusion.
    Walsh WR; Pelletier M; Wills D; Wang T; Bannigan S; Vizesi F
    Spine J; 2020 Nov; 20(11):1876-1886. PubMed ID: 32645503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early Outcomes of Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Titanium versus Polyetheretherketone Cage Implantation for Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration.
    Adl Amini D; Moser M; Oezel L; Zhu J; Okano I; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e14-e20. PubMed ID: 34863938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application of three-dimensional printed porous titanium alloy cage and poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
    Wang Y; Zhou Y; Chai X; Zhuo H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1126-1131. PubMed ID: 36111476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.
    Adl Amini D; Okano I; Oezel L; Zhu J; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2377-2384. PubMed ID: 34215921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Static Versus Expandable Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Interbody Cages: A Comparison of One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for One-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Canseco JA; Karamian BA; DiMaria SL; Patel PD; Divi SN; Chang M; Timmons T; Grewal L; Hallman H; Lee JK; Kaye ID; Woods BI; Kurd MF; Anderson DG; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e492-e501. PubMed ID: 34098137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Li Y; Liu W
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e581-e591. PubMed ID: 29288855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trabecular Bone Remodeling after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of the Osseointegration in Three-Dimensional Porous Titanium Cages and Polyether-Ether-Ketone Cages.
    Segi N; Nakashima H; Ito S; Ouchida J; Oishi R; Yamauchi I; Miyairi Y; Morita Y; Matsumoto T; Kanbara S; Ito K; Imagama S
    Global Spine J; 2024 May; ():21925682241255686. PubMed ID: 38752287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.