These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34274502)
21. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion. Wu SH; Li Y; Zhang YQ; Li XK; Yuan CF; Hao YL; Zhang ZY; Guo Z Artif Organs; 2013 Dec; 37(12):E191-201. PubMed ID: 24147953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages. Tan JH; Cheong CK; Hey HWD Eur Spine J; 2021 May; 30(5):1285-1295. PubMed ID: 33555365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study. Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation. Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Sultana T; Hossain M; Jeong JH; Im S World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e241-e255. PubMed ID: 37611804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiological evaluation of anterior lumbar fusion using PEEK cages with adjacent vertebral autograft in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries. Ni J; Zheng Y; Liu N; Wang X; Fang X; Phukan R; Wood KB Eur Spine J; 2015 Apr; 24(4):791-9. PubMed ID: 25618451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel S-Type, Dynamic Zero-Profile Cage Design for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Variations in Bone Graft Shape: A Finite Element Analysis. Manickam PS; Roy S; Shetty GM World Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 154():e199-e214. PubMed ID: 34246827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Kashii M; Kitaguchi K; Makino T; Kaito T J Orthop Sci; 2020 Jul; 25(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31375363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. PEEK Versus Titanium Static Interbody Cages: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for 1-Level TLIFs. Canseco JA; Karamian BA; Patel PD; Divi SN; Timmons T; Hallman H; Nachwalter R; Lee JK; Kurd MF; Anderson DG; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Oct; 34(8):E483-E493. PubMed ID: 34369911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical comparison of polyetheretherketone rods and titanium alloy rods in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis. Li J; Cao S; Zhao B BMC Surg; 2024 May; 24(1):169. PubMed ID: 38811965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of cage stiffness on the rate of lumbar interbody fusion: an in vivo model using poly(l-lactic Acid) and titanium cages. van Dijk M; Smit TH; Sugihara S; Burger EH; Wuisman PI Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(7):682-8. PubMed ID: 11923659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Dynamic Interbody Cage Improves Bone Formation in Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Porcine Biomechanical Study. Yang SH; Xiao FR; Lai DM; Wei CK; Tsuang FY Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2547-2558. PubMed ID: 34343157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computational comparison of three posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques by using porous titanium interbody cages with 50% porosity. Lee YH; Chung CJ; Wang CW; Peng YT; Chang CH; Chen CH; Chen YN; Li CT Comput Biol Med; 2016 Apr; 71():35-45. PubMed ID: 26874064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The postoperative clinical effects of utilizing 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cages in posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study. Wang Z; Zhang D; Zhang Z; Miao J Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38431. PubMed ID: 38905365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiological comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two closed-box plasmapore coated titanium cages: follow-up study over more than seven years. Kroppenstedt S; Gulde M; Schönmayr R Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(19):2083-8. PubMed ID: 18758364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Early Fusion Status After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation or Traditional Trajectory Screw Fixation: A Comparison Between the Titanium-coated Polyetheretherketone Cage and the Same Shape Polyetheretherketone Cage. Sakaura H; Ikegami D; Fujimori T; Sugiura T; Mukai Y Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Feb; 35(1):E47-E52. PubMed ID: 34369910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. PLIF surgery with titanium-coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological study. Schnake KJ; Fleiter N; Hoffmann C; Pingel A; Scholz M; Langheinrich A; Kandziora F Eur Spine J; 2021 Jan; 30(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 33091142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The in vivo response to a novel Ti coating compared with polyether ether ketone: evaluation of the periphery and inner surfaces of an implant. Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Christou C; He J; Vizesi F; Boden SD Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 29496625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with various porous additive manufactured cages. Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Xiang D; Liao Z; Liu W Comput Biol Med; 2018 Apr; 95():167-174. PubMed ID: 29501735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]