These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34274795)

  • 1. Strategies for pairwise searches in forensic kinship analysis.
    Brustad HK; Colucci M; Jobling MA; Sheehan NA; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102562. PubMed ID: 34274795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The limitations of kinship determinations using STR data in ill-defined populations.
    Zvénigorosky V; Sabbagh A; Gonzalez A; Fausser JL; Palstra F; Romanov G; Solovyev A; Barashkov N; Fedorova S; Crubézy É; Ludes B; Keyser C
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):1981-1990. PubMed ID: 32318826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit in the research of pairwise 2nd-degree kinship identification.
    Xu M; Du Q; Ma G; Chen Z; Liu Q; Fu L; Cong B; Li S
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1641-1650. PubMed ID: 30687898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pairwise kinship testing with microhaplotypes: Can advancements be made in kinship inference with these markers?
    Wu R; Chen H; Li R; Zang Y; Shen X; Hao B; Wang Q; Sun H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110875. PubMed ID: 34166816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Guidelines on the use of X-STRs in kinship analysis.
    Tillmar AO; Kling D; Butler JM; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Egeland T; Gusmão L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():269-275. PubMed ID: 28544956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.
    Dørum G; Kling D; Tillmar A; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 26614310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The likelihood ratio as a random variable for linked markers in kinship analysis.
    Egeland T; Slooten K
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 27519910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating DNA evidence possibly involving multiple (mixed) samples, common donors and related contributors.
    Kruijver M; Taylor D; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102532. PubMed ID: 34130043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved pairwise kinship analysis using massively parallel sequencing.
    Li R; Li H; Peng D; Hao B; Wang Z; Huang E; Wu R; Sun H
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():77-85. PubMed ID: 30368110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AUCP: An indicator for system effectiveness of panels in pairwise distant kinship identification.
    Ma G; Cong B; Li S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110539. PubMed ID: 33142188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Likelihood ratio and posterior odds in forensic genetics: Two sides of the same coin.
    Caliebe A; Walsh S; Liu F; Kayser M; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():203-210. PubMed ID: 28314239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biological kinship in 750 year old human remains from Central Argentina with signs of interpersonal violence.
    Nores R; Rena V; Angeletti SC; Demarchi DA; Modesti N; Fabra M
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Dec; 16(4):649-658. PubMed ID: 32915387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exact likelihood ratio calculations for pairwise cases.
    Egeland T; Pinto N; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():218-224. PubMed ID: 28482259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
    Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pairwise relatedness testing in the context of inbreeding: expectation and variance of the likelihood ratio.
    Brustad HK; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Jan; 135(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 32989564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods and Research Hotspots of Forensic Kinship Testing.
    Li R; Sun HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 37517010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA kinship analysis of unidentified human remains that led to a murder investigation.
    Starinsky-Elbaz S; Ariel T; Issan Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():e20-e23. PubMed ID: 31006546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Key individuals for discerning pedigrees belonging to the same autosomal kinship class.
    Gonçalves J; Conde-Sousa E; Egeland T; Amorim A; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():71-79. PubMed ID: 28380400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of alternative batteries of genetic markers to complement autosomal STRs in kinship investigations: autosomal indels vs. X-chromosome STRs.
    Gomes C; Magalhães M; Alves C; Amorim A; Pinto N; Gusmão L
    Int J Legal Med; 2012 Nov; 126(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 22940765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.