172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34275012)
1. Survival rates and reasons for revision of different stem designs in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia: a regional registry study.
Di Martino A; Castagnini F; Stefanini N; Bordini B; Geraci G; Pilla F; Traina F; Faldini C
J Orthop Traumatol; 2021 Jul; 22(1):29. PubMed ID: 34275012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Titanium modular stems in total hip arthroplasty due to developmental dysplasia: a registry comparison with single-taper implants.
Castagnini F; Cosentino M; Bordini B; Montalti M; Biondi F; Faldini C; Traina F
Hip Int; 2023 Sep; 33(5):916-924. PubMed ID: 36127850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do Stem Design and Surgical Approach Influence Early Aseptic Loosening in Cementless THA?
Janssen L; Wijnands KAP; Janssen D; Janssen MWHE; Morrenhof JW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1212-1220. PubMed ID: 29481346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tapered stems one-third proximally coated have higher complication rates than cylindrical two-third coated stems in patients with high hip dislocation undergoing total hip arthroplasty with step-cut shortening osteotomy.
Ozden VE; Dikmen G; Beksac B; Tozun IR
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):569-577. PubMed ID: 28300706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there a problem with modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up?
Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Lachiewicz PF; Ryan SP; Wellman SS
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):66-72. PubMed ID: 34192910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jul; 100(13):1132-1140. PubMed ID: 29975265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hydroxyapatite coating does not improve uncemented stem survival after total hip arthroplasty!
Hailer NP; Lazarinis S; Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Fenstad AM; Hallan G; Havelin L; Overgaard S; Pedersen AB; Mehnert F; Kärrholm J
Acta Orthop; 2015 Feb; 86(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 25175664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term survival of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Chougle A; Hemmady MV; Hodgkinson JP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jan; 88(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 16391251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short Stems Versus Conventional Stems in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Registry Study.
Giardina F; Castagnini F; Stea S; Bordini B; Montalti M; Toni A
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1794-1799. PubMed ID: 29395723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].
Parratte S; Argenson JN; Flecher X; Aubaniac JM
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 17534208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Study From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):447-452. PubMed ID: 28947370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Huang Y; Zhou Y; Shao H; Gu J; Tang H; Tang Q
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3108-3113. PubMed ID: 28602532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Up to 10-year follow-up of the Symax stem in THA: a Danish single-centre study.
Edwards NM; Varnum C; Kjærsgaard-Andersen P
Hip Int; 2018 Jul; 28(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 29192731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single Wedge Femoral Stem Designs are Associated With a Higher Risk for Revision After Cementless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Reddy NC; Chang RN; Prentice HA; Paxton EW; Kelly MP; Khatod M
J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):855-861.e1. PubMed ID: 36535447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total hip arthroplasty with use of an acetabular reinforcement ring in patients who have congenital dysplasia of the hip. Results at five to fifteen years.
Gill TJ; Sledge JB; Müller ME
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Jul; 80(7):969-79. PubMed ID: 9698001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Successful femoral reconstruction with a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Skyttä ET; Eskelinen A; Remes V
Scand J Surg; 2012; 101(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 22968248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Promising results of revision total hip arthroplasty using a hexagonal, modular, tapered stem in cases of aseptic loosening.
Schwarze J; Theil C; Gosheger G; Dieckmann R; Moellenbeck B; Ackmann T; Schmidt-Braekling T
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233035. PubMed ID: 32574168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Why Are Contemporary Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties Failing? An Analysis of 2500 Cases.
Goldman AH; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S11-S16. PubMed ID: 30765230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
