180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34275191)
1. Evaluation of Sigma metric approach for monitoring the performance of automated analyzers in hematology unit of Alexandria Main University Hospital.
Ahmed El-Neanaey W; Mahmoud AbdEllatif N; Abdel Haleem Abo Elwafa R
Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Dec; 43(6):1388-1393. PubMed ID: 34275191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000.
Bruegel M; Nagel D; Funk M; Fuhrmann P; Zander J; Teupser D
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Jun; 53(7):1057-71. PubMed ID: 25720071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality control validation for a veterinary laboratory network of six Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzers.
Daly S; Graham PA; Freeman KP
Vet Clin Pathol; 2022 Dec; 51(4):565-576. PubMed ID: 35922888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sigma metric used to evaluate the performance of haematology analysers: choosing an internal reference analyser for the laboratory.
Li M; Li X; Lu X; Zhong M; Wang L; Song M; Xue F
Hematology; 2023 Dec; 28(1):2277498. PubMed ID: 37916652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeat patient testing-quality control with canine samples shows promise as an alternative to commercial quality control material for a network of four Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzers.
Daly S; Graham PA; Freeman KP
Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():39-47. PubMed ID: 37232498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of hematology quality control using six sigma metrics.
Goel S; Nisal AR; Raj A; Nimbargi RC
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2024 Apr; 67(2):332-335. PubMed ID: 38394423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance evaluation of the automated nucleated red blood cell count of five commercial hematological analyzers.
Da Rin G; Vidali M; Balboni F; Benegiamo A; Borin M; Ciardelli ML; Dima F; Di Fabio A; Fanelli A; Fiorini F; Francione S; Germagnoli L; Gioia M; Lari T; Lorubbio M; Marini A; Papa A; Seghezzi M; Solarino L; Pipitone S; Tilocca E; Buoro S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Dec; 39(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28990291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study.
Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytical performance evaluation of a high-volume hematology laboratory utilizing sigma metrics as standard of excellence.
Shaikh MS; Moiz B
Int J Lab Hematol; 2016 Apr; 38(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 26847366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Sysmex XN-V hematology analyzer for canine specimens.
Grebert M; Granat F; Braun JP; Leroy Q; Bourgès-Abella N; Trumel C
Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Jun; 50(2):184-197. PubMed ID: 34152026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation and comparison of the new Mindray BC-6200 hematology analyzer with ADVIA 2120i.
Kulik K; Kwiecień I; Chełstowska B; Rutkowska E; Rzepecki P
Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Jun; 43(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 33270987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV™ compared to the ADVIA® 2120 for its use in dogs, cats, and horses: Part I--precision, linearity, and accuracy of complete blood cell count.
Bauer N; Nakagawa J; Dunker C; Failing K; Moritz A
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2011 Nov; 23(6):1168-80. PubMed ID: 22362798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance characteristics of automated clinical chemistry analyzers using commercial assay reagents contributing to quality assurance and clinical decision in a hospital laboratory.
Tzortzopoulos A; Raftopoulos V; Talias MA
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2020 Feb; 80(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 31766906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Performance analysis of the « Blast » flag on ADVIA
Aidoudi F; Baccini V; Bardet B; Lafon C; Pellicier A; Reins F; Tales P
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2019 Apr; 77(2):174-178. PubMed ID: 30998198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison study of the rates of manual peripheral blood smear review from 3 automated hematology analyzers, Unicel DxH 800, ADVIA 2120i, and XE 2100, using international consensus group guidelines.
Kim SJ; Kim Y; Shin S; Song J; Choi JR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Nov; 136(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 23106587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeat patient testing-quality control compared to commercial quality control material for the Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzer in a multi-site veterinary laboratory.
Daly S; Rishniw M; Graham PA; Freeman KP
Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():48-59. PubMed ID: 38356015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV ™ compared to the ADVIA ® 2120 for its use in dogs, cats, and horses. Part II: Accuracy of leukocyte differential and reticulocyte count, impact of anticoagulant and sample aging.
Bauer N; Nakagawa J; Dunker C; Failing K; Moritz A
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2012 Jan; 24(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 22362937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Improving the quality of hematological studies using sigmametry.].
Petrova OV; Shabanova GR; Murygina OI; Panova EV; Nikulina DM
Klin Lab Diagn; 2019; 64(10):599-602. PubMed ID: 31742952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Canine differential leukocyte counting with the CellaVision DM96Vision, Sysmex XT-2000iV, and Advia 2120 hematology analyzers and a manual method.
Tvedten HW; Lilliehöök IE
Vet Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 40(3):324-39. PubMed ID: 21884185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Sysmex XT-2000iV analyzer performance across a network of five veterinary laboratories using a commercially available quality control material.
Daly S; Freeman KP; Graham PA
Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Dec; 50(4):568-578. PubMed ID: 34859473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
