153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34275203)
1. White blood cell evaluation in haematological malignancies using a web-based digital microscopy platform.
Makhija K; Lincz LF; Attalla K; Scorgie FE; Enjeti AK; Prasad R
Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Dec; 43(6):1379-1387. PubMed ID: 34275203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative evaluation of three consecutive artificial intelligence algorithms released by Techcyte for identification of blasts and white blood cells in abnormal peripheral blood films.
Lincz LF; Makhija K; Attalla K; Scorgie FE; Enjeti AK; Prasad R
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):92-98. PubMed ID: 37786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance comparison of two automated digital morphology analyzers for leukocyte differential in patients with malignant hematological diseases: Mindray MC-80 and Sysmex DI-60.
Ye X; Fang L; Chen Y; Tong J; Ning X; Feng L; Xu Y; Yang D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Jun; 46(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 38212663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of the digital morphology analyser Sysmex DI-60 for white blood cell differentials in abnormal samples.
Zhao Y; Diao Y; Zheng J; Li X; Luan H
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14344. PubMed ID: 38906933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphogo: An Automatic Bone Marrow Cell Classification System on Digital Images Analyzed by Artificial Intelligence.
Fu X; Fu M; Li Q; Peng X; Lu J; Fang F; Chen M
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(6):588-596. PubMed ID: 32721953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial intelligence of digital morphology analyzers improves the efficiency of manual leukocyte differentiation of peripheral blood.
Xing Y; Liu X; Dai J; Ge X; Wang Q; Hu Z; Wu Z; Zeng X; Xu D; Qu C
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Mar; 23(1):50. PubMed ID: 36991420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Scopio Labs X100 Full Field PBS: The first high-resolution full field viewing of peripheral blood specimens combined with artificial intelligence-based morphological analysis.
Katz BZ; Feldman MD; Tessema M; Benisty D; Toles GS; Andre A; Shtreker B; Paz FM; Edwards J; Jengehino D; Bagg A; Avivi I; Pozdnyakova O
Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Dec; 43(6):1408-1416. PubMed ID: 34546630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of digital morphology analyzer Vision Pro on white blood cell differentials.
Yoon S; Hur M; Park M; Kim H; Kim SW; Lee TH; Nam M; Moon HW; Yun YM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 May; 59(6):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 33470955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Performance evaluation and validation of automated digital image analysis in peripheral blood cells morphology examination].
Wang R; Yang MY; Zhang JY; Su HQ; Duan J; Mi J; Wang ML
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Jan; 102(4):261-266. PubMed ID: 35073674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Preliminary Study on the Identification of Aerobic Vaginitis by Artificial Intelligence Analysis System].
Ye L; Yu F; Hu Z; Wang X; Tang Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Mar; 55(2):461-468. PubMed ID: 38645857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical application of automated digital image analysis for morphology review of peripheral blood leukocyte].
Xing Y; Yan X; Pu C; Shang K; Dong N; Wang R; Wang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 96(8):634-9. PubMed ID: 26932858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80.
Khongjaroensakun N; Chaothai N; Chamchomdao L; Suriyachand K; Paisooksantivatana K
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Oct; 45(5):691-699. PubMed ID: 37338111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of a five-color flow cytometric assay for verifying automated white blood cell differentials.
Huang CM; Yu LH; Pu CW; Wang X; Wang G; Shen LS; Wang JZ; Cui W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Feb; 126(4):716-21. PubMed ID: 23422195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Artificial intelligence (AI) and hematological diseases: establishment of a peripheral blood convolutional neural network (CNN)-based digital morphology analysis system].
Ohsaka A
Rinsho Ketsueki; 2020; 61(5):564-569. PubMed ID: 32507825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XN-1000 hematology analyzer in assessment of the white blood cell count differential in pediatric specimens.
Becker PH; Fenneteau O; Da Costa L
Int J Lab Hematol; 2016 Feb; 38(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 26407903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. GFNB: Gini index-based Fuzzy Naive Bayes and blast cell segmentation for leukemia detection using multi-cell blood smear images.
Das BK; Dutta HS
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Nov; 58(11):2789-2803. PubMed ID: 32929660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated leucocyte differentials in 292 patients with leucopenia: an evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 3500 (CD3500) haematology analyser.
Burchert-Graeve M; Kock R
Clin Lab Haematol; 1996 Dec; 18(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 9054698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of digital morphology analyzer Medica EasyCell assistant.
Kim H; Lee GH; Yoon S; Hur M; Kim HN; Park M; Kim SW
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Sep; 61(10):1858-1866. PubMed ID: 37084402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of the new MC-80 automated digital cell morphology analyser in detection of normal and abnormal blood cells: Comparison with the CellaVision DM9600.
Merino A; Laguna J; Rodríguez-García M; Julian J; Casanova A; Molina A
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 37746889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
