124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34278352)
1. Comparison of electronic versus manual witnessing of procedures within the in vitro fertilization laboratory: impact on timing and efficiency.
Holmes R; Wirka KA; Catherino AB; Hayward B; Swain JE
F S Rep; 2021 Jun; 2(2):181-188. PubMed ID: 34278352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electronic witness system in IVF-patients perspective.
Forte M; Faustini F; Maggiulli R; Scarica C; Romano S; Ottolini C; Farcomeni A; Palagiano A; Capalbo A; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Sep; 33(9):1215-22. PubMed ID: 27387889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Preliminary Experience of Integration of an Electronic Witness System, its Validation, Efficacy on Lab Performance, and Staff Satisfaction Assessment in a Busy Indian
Gupta S; Fauzdar A; Singh VJ; Srivastava A; Sharma K; Singh S
J Hum Reprod Sci; 2020; 13(4):333-339. PubMed ID: 33627984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fertilization, usable blastocyst development and sustained implantation rates according to intracytoplasmic sperm injection operator experience.
Tiegs AW; Scott RT
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Jul; 41(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 32466993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comprehensive protocol of traceability during IVF: the result of a multicentre failure mode and effect analysis.
Rienzi L; Bariani F; Dalla Zorza M; Albani E; Benini F; Chamayou S; Minasi MG; Parmegiani L; Restelli L; Vizziello G; Costa AN;
Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1612-1620. PubMed ID: 28575413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure mode and effects analysis of witnessing protocols for ensuring traceability during IVF.
Rienzi L; Bariani F; Dalla Zorza M; Romano S; Scarica C; Maggiulli R; Nanni Costa A; Ubaldi FM
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Oct; 31(4):516-22. PubMed ID: 26292780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo.
Kaser DJ; Farland LV; Missmer SA; Racowsky C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1604-1611. PubMed ID: 28854587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.
Storr A; Venetis CA; Cooke S; Kilani S; Ledger W
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 28031323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Will the introduction of automated ART laboratory systems render the majority of embryologists redundant?
Bori L; Meseguer M
Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Dec; 43(6):979-981. PubMed ID: 34753681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of ICSI-related procedural timings and operators on the outcome.
Maggiulli R; Cimadomo D; Fabozzi G; Papini L; Dovere L; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 31916573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Failure mode and effects analysis of witnessing protocols for ensuring traceability during PGD/PGS cycles.
Cimadomo D; Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Maggiulli R; Scarica C; Romano S; Poggiana C; Zuccarello D; Giancani A; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L
Reprod Biomed Online; 2016 Sep; 33(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 27372783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Types and frequency of non-conformances in an IVF laboratory.
Sakkas D; Barrett CB; Alper MM
Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 33(12):2196-2204. PubMed ID: 30388228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015).
; De los Santos MJ; Apter S; Coticchio G; Debrock S; Lundin K; Plancha CE; Prados F; Rienzi L; Verheyen G; Woodward B; Vermeulen N
Hum Reprod; 2016 Apr; 31(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 26908842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(18):1-63. PubMed ID: 23074488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Dusi L; Buffo L; Amendola MG; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Bruno G; Stoppa M; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study.
Koedooder R; Singer M; Schoenmakers S; Savelkoul PHM; Morré SA; de Jonge JD; Poort L; Cuypers WJSS; Beckers NGM; Broekmans FJM; Cohlen BJ; den Hartog JE; Fleischer K; Lambalk CB; Smeenk JMJS; Budding AE; Laven JSE
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1042-1054. PubMed ID: 31119299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading system.
Hammond ER; Foong AKM; Rosli N; Morbeck DE
Hum Reprod; 2020 May; 35(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 32358601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Autism and mental retardation among offspring born after in vitro fertilization.
Sandin S; Nygren KG; Iliadou A; Hultman CM; Reichenberg A
JAMA; 2013 Jul; 310(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 23821091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Greater fetal crown-rump length growth with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection conceptions after thawed versus fresh blastocyst transfers: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.
Cavoretto PI; Farina A; Girardelli S; Gaeta G; Spinillo S; Morano D; Amodeo S; Galdini A; Viganò P; Candiani M
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):147-156. PubMed ID: 33500139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of Day 5 KIDScore™ morphokinetic prediction models of implantation and live birth after single blastocyst transfer.
Reignier A; Girard JM; Lammers J; Chtourou S; Lefebvre T; Barriere P; Freour T
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Nov; 36(11):2279-2285. PubMed ID: 31444634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
