These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3427890)

  • 1. Comparison of susceptibility results of anaerobic organisms determined by agar dilution method and Sceptor Anaerobe MIC/ID Micro Broth Dilution Panels.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Schieven BC; Stoakes L; Groves D
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 Oct; 8(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 3427890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of four commercial microdilution systems for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Heizmann W; Werner H; Herb B
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Dec; 7(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 3145858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria determined by agar dilution and by a microbroth method.
    Baron EJ; Bruckner DA
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S249-53. PubMed ID: 6718938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Sceptor Pseudomonas Plus MIC Panel with agar dilution for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Joyce LF; Stockman K; Downes J; Andrew JH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Oct; 30(10):2714-6. PubMed ID: 1400973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of spiral gradient endpoint and agar dilution methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: a multilaboratory collaborative evaluation.
    Wexler HM; Molitoris E; Murray PR; Washington J; Zabransky RJ; Edelstein PH; Finegold SM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 34(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 8748295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ceftizoxime and cefoxitin susceptibility testing against anaerobic bacteria: comparison of results from three NCCLS methods and quality control recommendations for the reference agar dilution procedure.
    Jones RN; Barry AL; Fuchs PC; Allen SD
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 Oct; 8(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 3480787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by two methods of inoculum preparation.
    Bourgault AM; Lamothe F
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1060-4. PubMed ID: 6520217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Susceptibility testing of fastidious organisms in the API microdilution panel.
    Robinson A; Mortensen JE; LaRocca M
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 Apr; 6(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 3495393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Sceptor microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing system: a collaborative investigation.
    Jones RN; Thornsberry C; Barry AL; Gavan TL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):184-94. PubMed ID: 6780600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of sensititre broth microdilution and agar dilution susceptibility testing techniques for meropenem to determine accuracy, reproducibility, and predictive values.
    Dowzicky MJ; Nadler HL; Sheikh W
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2204-7. PubMed ID: 7814547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multilaboratory comparison of anaerobe susceptibility results using 3 different agar media.
    Roe DE; Finegold SM; Citron DM; Goldstein EJ; Wexler HM; Rosenblatt JE; Cox ME; Jenkins SG; Hecht DW
    Clin Infect Dis; 2002 Sep; 35(Suppl 1):S40-6. PubMed ID: 12173107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of the micro-media system, sceptor, and MIC-2000 microdilution methods for testing Pseudomonas aeruginosa against gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin.
    Woolfrey BF; Lally RT; Quall CO
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Feb; 17(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 6403574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Citron DM; Ostovari MI; Karlsson A; Goldstein EJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 29(10):2197-203. PubMed ID: 1939571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Olsson-Liljequist B; Nord CE
    Clin Infect Dis; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 4():S293-6. PubMed ID: 8086578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for testing the susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to two fluoroquinolone compounds, PD 131628 and clinafloxacin.
    Barry AL; Fuchs PC; Citron DM; Allen SD; Wexler HM
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Jun; 31(6):893-900. PubMed ID: 8395494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria].
    García-Sánchez JE; García-Sánchez E; García-García MI
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2014 Feb; 32 Suppl 1():23-9. PubMed ID: 24630580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Clostridium difficile minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained using agar dilution vs broth microdilution methods.
    Hastey CJ; Dale SE; Nary J; Citron D; Law JH; Roe-Carpenter DE; Chesnel L
    Anaerobe; 2017 Apr; 44():73-77. PubMed ID: 28188880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Susceptibility results for the Bacteroides fragilis group: comparison of the broth microdilution and agar dilution methods.
    Hecht DW; Lederer L; Osmolski JR
    Clin Infect Dis; 1995 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():S342-5. PubMed ID: 7548593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of broth microdilution susceptibility results for anaerobic organisms by use of a rapid direct colony inoculum.
    Mangels JI; Lindberg LH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 21(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 3972999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study of the sensitivity of anaerobic bacteria using 2 dilution technics].
    Tigaud S; Cochat N; Vincent P
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 Jun; 33(5 Pt 2):573-6. PubMed ID: 3911155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.