These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34278955)

  • 21. Sleep and eyewitness memory: Fewer false identifications after sleep when the target is absent from the lineup.
    Stepan ME; Dehnke TM; Fenn KM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0182907. PubMed ID: 28877169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intergroup biases and eyewitness testimony.
    Lindholm T; Christianson SA
    J Soc Psychol; 1998 Dec; 138(6):710-23. PubMed ID: 9872065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eyewitness recognition errors: the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults.
    Memon A; Hope L; Bartlett J; Bull R
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Dec; 30(8):1219-27. PubMed ID: 12661853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Test a Witness's Memory of a Suspect Only Once.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL; Loftus EF; Garrett BL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2021 Dec; 22(1_suppl):1S-18S. PubMed ID: 34730037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L; Clark SE; Gronlund SD; Roediger HL
    Am Psychol; 2015 Sep; 70(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 26348334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Investigating investigators: examining the impact of eyewitness identification evidence on student-investigators.
    Boyce MA; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 18060486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
    Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identifying the bad guy in a lineup using confidence judgments under deadline pressure.
    Brewer N; Weber N; Wootton D; Lindsay DS
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22933457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of Twitter exposure on false memory formation.
    Fenn KM; Griffin NR; Uitvlugt MG; Ravizza SM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1551-6. PubMed ID: 24825304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are multiple-trial experiments appropriate for eyewitness identification studies? Accuracy, choosing, and confidence across trials.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Lindsay RCL
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):2235-2254. PubMed ID: 28432569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lineup administrators' expectations: their impact on eyewitness confidence.
    Garrioch L; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 11480805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Eyewitness confidence malleability: Misinformation as post-identification feedback.
    Greenspan RL; Loftus EF
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):194-208. PubMed ID: 32378911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification.
    Akan M; Robinson MM; Mickes L; Wixted JT; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):369-392. PubMed ID: 33271047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Showup identification decisions for multiple perpetrator crimes: Testing for sequential dependencies.
    Tupper N; Sauerland M; Sauer JD; Broers NJ; Charman SD; Hope L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208403. PubMed ID: 30521572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.