These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34280706)

  • 1. Higher rate of aortic stenosis progression in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve - A single center experience.
    Hamala P; Kasprzak JD; Lipiec P; Sobczak-Kaleta M; Wierzbowska-Drabik K
    Adv Med Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(2):343-350. PubMed ID: 34280706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic Implications of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve Phenotype on Progression of Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Ascending Aorta Dilatation.
    Chew NWS; Phua K; Ho YJ; Zhang A; Lin N; Ngiam JN; Lau YX; Teo VXY; Sia CH; Loh PH; Kuntjoro I; Wong RCC; Lee CH; Tan HC; Yeo TC; Kong WKF; Poh KK
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 161():76-83. PubMed ID: 34627597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.
    Ye Z; Clavel MA; Foley TA; Pibarot P; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
    Heart; 2024 Mar; 110(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 37903555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bicuspid aortic valve area in normal heart.
    Katz M; Mazin I; Kuperstein R; Beigel R; Vaturi O; Feinberg MS; Raanani E; Ben Zekry S
    Echocardiography; 2020 Mar; 37(3):439-444. PubMed ID: 32077517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic Stenosis Progression, Cardiac Damage, and Survival: Comparison Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
    Yang LT; Boler A; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Maurer MJ; Eleid MF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Tribouilloy C; Michelena HI
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun; 14(6):1113-1126. PubMed ID: 33744153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aortic stiffness in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiovascular MRI: a comparison between bicuspid and tricuspid valves.
    Singh A; Horsfield MA; Bekele S; Greenwood JP; Dawson DK; Berry C; Hogrefe K; Kelly DJ; Houston JG; Guntur Ramkumar P; Uddin A; Suzuki T; McCann GP
    Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2340-2349. PubMed ID: 30488106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype on progression of aortic stenosis.
    Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Arsenault M; Bédard É; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jul; 21(7):727-734. PubMed ID: 32386199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis.
    Huntley GD; Thaden JJ; Alsidawi S; Michelena HI; Maleszewski JJ; Edwards WD; Scott CG; Pislaru SV; Pellikka PA; Greason KL; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Nkomo VT
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 29029001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Less pronounced reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to tricuspid aortic stenosis.
    Xiong TY; Wang X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Zheng MX; Zhou X; Peng Y; Wei JF; Feng Y; Chen M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 29915878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraleaflet haemorrhage as a mechanism of rapid progression of stenosis in bicuspid aortic valve.
    Akahori H; Tsujino T; Naito Y; Yoshida C; Lee-Kawabata M; Ohyanagi M; Mitsuno M; Miyamoto Y; Daimon T; Masuyama T
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Jul; 167(2):514-8. PubMed ID: 22357417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
    Sia CH; Ho JS; Chua JJ; Tan BY; Ngiam NJ; Chew N; Sim HW; Chen R; Lee CH; Yeo TC; Kong WK; Poh KK
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 128():210-215. PubMed ID: 32534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence of subannular and left ventricular morphological differences in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.
    Disha K; Dubslaff G; Rouman M; Fey B; Borger MA; Barker AJ; Kuntze T; Girdauskas E
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 28040769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease and Stenosis: The National Echo Database of Australia.
    Lim MS; Strange G; Playford D; Stewart S; Celermajer DS
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 Sep; 10(17):e020785. PubMed ID: 34459236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multichamber Strain Characterization Is a Robust Prognosticator for Both Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis.
    Ye Z; Yang LT; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Padang R; Luis SA; Nkomo VT; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2022 Sep; 35(9):956-965. PubMed ID: 35613661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heritability of aortic valve stenosis and bicuspid enrichment in families with aortic valve stenosis.
    Boureau AS; Karakachoff M; Le Scouarnec S; Capoulade R; Cueff C; de Decker L; Senage T; Verhoye JP; Baufreton C; Roussel JC; Dina C; Probst V; Schott JJ; Le Tourneau T
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Jul; 359():91-98. PubMed ID: 35427703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic annulus and root characteristics in severe aortic stenosis due to bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valves: implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapies.
    Philip F; Faza NN; Schoenhagen P; Desai MY; Tuzcu EM; Svensson LG; Kapadia SR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):E88-98. PubMed ID: 25914355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patterns of ascending aortic dilatation and predictors of surgical replacement of the aorta: A comparison of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve patients over eight years of follow-up.
    Agnese V; Pasta S; Michelena HI; Minà C; Romano GM; Carerj S; Zito C; Maalouf JF; Foley TA; Raffa G; Clemenza F; Pilato M; Bellavia D
    J Mol Cell Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 135():31-39. PubMed ID: 31348923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Demonstrate Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling and Impaired Cardiac Function Before Surgery With Increased Risk of Postoperative Heart Failure.
    Wedin JO; Vedin O; Rodin S; Simonson OE; Hörsne Malmborg J; Pallin J; James SK; Flachskampf FA; Ståhle E; Grinnemo KH
    Circulation; 2022 Oct; 146(17):1310-1322. PubMed ID: 35971843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in metabolic profiles between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Xiong TY; Liu C; Liao YB; Zheng W; Li YJ; Li X; Ou Y; Wang ZJ; Wang X; Li CM; Zhao ZG; Feng Y; Liu XJ; Chen M
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 May; 20(1):229. PubMed ID: 32423380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis.
    Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Larose É; Bédard É; Arsenault M; Chetaille P; Dumesnil JG; Mathieu P; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27504001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.