These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34281025)
41. Detection of extraneous water ingress into the sewer system using tandem methods - a case study in Trondheim city. Beheshti M; Sægrov S Water Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 79(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 30865594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Laboratory experiments and simulation analysis to evaluate the application potential of pressure remote RTC in water distribution networks. Campisano A; Modica C; Musmeci F; Bosco C; Gullotta A Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116072. PubMed ID: 32622237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Integration of environmental aspects in modelling and optimisation of water supply chains. Koleva MN; Calderón AJ; Zhang D; Styan CA; Papageorgiou LG Sci Total Environ; 2018 Sep; 636():314-338. PubMed ID: 29709850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Integrated hydraulic modelling of water supply and urban drainage networks for assessment of decentralized options. Sitzenfrei R; Rauch W Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(11):1817-24. PubMed ID: 25500471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Water leakage management by district metered areas at water distribution networks. Özdemir Ö Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Mar; 190(4):182. PubMed ID: 29497875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Optimal operation of a potable water distribution network. Biscos C; Mulholland M; Le Lann MV; Brouckaert CJ; Bailey R; Roustan M Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(9):155-62. PubMed ID: 12448464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Modeling and optimization of pressure and water age for evaluation of urban water distribution systems performance. Desta WM; Feyessa FF; Debela SK Heliyon; 2022 Nov; 8(11):e11257. PubMed ID: 36353166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Using a map-based assessment tool for the development of cost-effective WFD river basin action programmes in a changing climate. Kaspersen BS; Jacobsen TV; Butts MB; Jensen NH; Boegh E; Seaby LP; Müller HG; Kjaer T J Environ Manage; 2016 Aug; 178():70-82. PubMed ID: 27139599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Sustainable management of a coupled groundwater-agriculture hydrosystem using multi-criteria simulation based optimisation. Grundmann J; Schütze N; Lennartz F Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(3):689-98. PubMed ID: 23202577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. An experimental study of how hydraulic transients cause mobilisation of material within drinking water distribution systems. Weston SL; Collins RP; Boxall JB Water Res; 2021 Apr; 194():116890. PubMed ID: 33592354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Integrated modeling of agricultural scenarios (IMAS) to support pesticide action plans: the case of the Coulonge drinking water catchment area (SW France). Vernier F; Leccia-Phelpin O; Lescot JM; Minette S; Miralles A; Barberis D; Scordia C; Kuentz-Simonet V; Tonneau JP Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar; 24(8):6923-6950. PubMed ID: 27726081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Dual graph characteristics of water distribution networks-how optimal are design solutions? Sitzenfrei R; Hajibabaei M; Hesarkazzazi S; Diao K Complex Intell Systems; 2023; 9(1):147-160. PubMed ID: 36844980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Analysis of polysulfides in drinking water distribution systems using headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Kristiana I; Heitz A; Joll C; Sathasivan A J Chromatogr A; 2010 Sep; 1217(38):5995-6001. PubMed ID: 20708191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The application of economic-engineering optimisation for water management in Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico. Medellín-Azuara J; Mendoza-Espinosa LG; Lund JR; Ramírez-Acosta RJ Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(1-2):339-47. PubMed ID: 17305158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Hypertonic-hyperoncotic solutions improve cardiac function in children after open-heart surgery. Schroth M; Plank C; Meissner U; Eberle KP; Weyand M; Cesnjevar R; Dötsch J; Rascher W Pediatrics; 2006 Jul; 118(1):e76-84. PubMed ID: 16751617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Flexible Reconfiguration of Existing Urban Water Infrastructure Systems. Perelman LS; Allen M; Preis A; Iqbal M; Whittle AJ Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13378-84. PubMed ID: 26465822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Estimating the environmental and resource costs of leakage in water distribution systems: A shadow price approach. Molinos-Senante M; Mocholí-Arce M; Sala-Garrido R Sci Total Environ; 2016 Oct; 568():180-188. PubMed ID: 27289397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Discolouration in potable water distribution systems: a review. Vreeburg JH; Boxall JB Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(3):519-29. PubMed ID: 17174377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cost versus life cycle assessment-based environmental impact optimization of drinking water production plants. Capitanescu F; Rege S; Marvuglia A; Benetto E; Ahmadi A; Gutiérrez TN; Tiruta-Barna L J Environ Manage; 2016 Jul; 177():278-87. PubMed ID: 27107954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Risk assessment of hybrid rain harvesting system and other small drinking water supply systems by game theory and fuzzy logic modeling. Liu B; Huang JJ; McBean E; Li Y Sci Total Environ; 2020 Mar; 708():134436. PubMed ID: 31780148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]