These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34281124)
1. A Novel Fire Risk Assessment Approach for Large-Scale Commercial and High-Rise Buildings Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Coupling Revision. Wang Y; Hou L; Li M; Zheng R Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34281124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comprehensive Investigation on the Fire Hazards and Environmental Risks in a Commercial Complex Based on Fault Tree Analysis and the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Wang Y; Ni X; Wang J; Hu Z; Lu K Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 33050057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fire risk assessment of high-rise buildings under construction based on unascertained measure theory. Li W; Li H; Liu Y; Wang S; Pei X; Li Q PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239166. PubMed ID: 32925958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The development and realisation of a multi-faceted system for green building planning: A case in Ningbo using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Li Z; Chow DHC; Ding D; Ying J; Hu Y; Chen H; Zhao W Energy Build; 2020 Nov; 226():110371. PubMed ID: 32836721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2019 Writing Contest Post-graduate Winner: Fire Safety Behaviors Among Residential High-Rise Building Occupants in Hawai'i: A Qualitative Study. Glauberman G Hawaii J Health Soc Welf; 2020 Aug; 79(8):249-255. PubMed ID: 32789296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fire Risk Assessments of Informal Settlements Based on Fire Risk Index and Bayesian Network. Hu J; Xie X; Shu X; Shen S; Ni X; Zhang L Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strategies for controlling violence against health care workers: Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy additive ratio assessment. Rajabi F; Jahangiri M; Bagherifard F; Banaee S; Farhadi P J Nurs Manag; 2020 May; 28(4):777-786. PubMed ID: 32104935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bimodal fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (BFAHP) for coronary heart disease risk assessment. Sabahi F J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jul; 83():204-216. PubMed ID: 29625186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Studying Significant Factors Associated with Frequent Lane Changing. Moslem S; Farooq D; Jamal A; Almarhabi Y; Almoshaogeh M; Butt FM; Tufail RF Entropy (Basel); 2022 Mar; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 35327878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-Risk Assessment of Mine Lithium Battery Fire Based on Quantitative Factor Characterization. Li K; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang S; Zou X Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing a risk assessment method for infectious diseases focusing on COVID-19 based on the Delphi method and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Soltanzadeh A; Adeli SH; Sadeghi Yarandi M; Mahdinia M Work; 2022; 73(3):799-808. PubMed ID: 35988256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preventive measures for fire-related injuries and their risk factors in residential buildings: a systematic review. Shokouhi M; Nasiriani K; Cheraghi Z; Ardalan A; Khankeh H; Fallahzadeh H; Khorasani-Zavareh D J Inj Violence Res; 2019 Jan; 11(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 30416192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fire system safety risk cognition model and evaluation of major public safety risks. Li W; Lu X; Dong X Front Public Health; 2022; 10():987277. PubMed ID: 36117610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Risk Evaluation Model. Peng G; Han L; Liu Z; Guo Y; Yan J; Jia X Front Psychol; 2021; 12():715003. PubMed ID: 34630224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based risk priority number for risk assessments of commissioning process of a ring gantry LINAC. Chang J; Jang S; Lalonde R; Huq SM J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 23(11):e13760. PubMed ID: 35998202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety Evaluation for Fabricated Small Box Girder Bridges Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Monitoring Data. Yang H; Jiang L; Xu F; Gu J; Ye Z; Peng Y; Liu Z; Cheng R Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 39065990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors associated with high-rise evacuation: qualitative results from the World Trade Center Evacuation Study. Gershon RR; Qureshi KA; Rubin MS; Raveis VH Prehosp Disaster Med; 2007; 22(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 17894208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety concept of fire related injuries in inhabitants of residential buildings in Iran: A qualitative study. Shokouhi M; Khorasani-Zavareh D; Rezapur-Shahkolai F; Khankeh H; Nasiriani K Injury; 2020 Aug; 51(8):1817-1822. PubMed ID: 32482431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the sustainable safety practices based on human behavior factors: an application to Chinese petrochemical industry. Zhang J; Qu Q; Chen XB Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(29):44618-44637. PubMed ID: 35133599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk assessment of mega-city infrastructures related to land subsidence using improved trapezoidal FAHP. Lyu HM; Shen SL; Zhou A; Yang J Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 717():135310. PubMed ID: 31839300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]