These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34281127)

  • 21. Personal attenuation ratings versus derated noise reduction ratings for hearing protection devices.
    Murphy WJ; Gong W; Karch SJ; Federman J; Schulz TY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):1074. PubMed ID: 36050158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How hearing conservation training format impacts personal attenuation ratings in U.S. Marine Corps Training Recruits.
    Federman J; Karch SJ; Duhon C
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 32924674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improved hearing protector attenuation through the use of a lubricant.
    Ryan TJ; Meier RS; Tatarka A
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Nov; 14(11):931-937. PubMed ID: 28763289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating the effect of training along with fit testing on foam earplug users in four factories in China.
    Gong W; Liu X; Liu Y; Li L
    Int J Audiol; 2019 May; 58(5):269-277. PubMed ID: 30880506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hearing protector fit testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas.
    Murphy WJ; Themann CL; Murata TK
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):688-98. PubMed ID: 27414471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Training in the proper use of earplugs: An objective evaluation.
    Takada MM; Rocha CH; Neves-Lobo IF; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
    Work; 2020; 65(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 32007983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses.
    Schulz TY
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):152-62. PubMed ID: 21368441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating Earplug Performance over a 2-Hour Work Period with a Fit-Test System.
    Gong W; Murphy WJ; Meinke DK; Feng HA; Stephenson MR
    Semin Hear; 2023 Nov; 44(4):470-484. PubMed ID: 37818150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Applying Kurtosis as an Indirect Metric of Noise Temporal Structure in the Assessment of Hearing Loss Associated With Occupational Complex Noise Exposure.
    Zhang M; Qiu W; Xie H; Xu X; Shi Z; Gao X; Zhou L; Zou H; Hu W; Sun X
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1782-1796. PubMed ID: 34369415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of hearing protection device effectiveness for musicians.
    Crawford K; Willenbring K; Nothwehr F; Fleckenstein S; Anthony TR
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 35143376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of Earplugs in Preventing Recreational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Ramakers GG; Kraaijenga VJ; Cattani G; van Zanten GA; Grolman W
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Jun; 142(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 27054284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase factory workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kazanis AS; Eakin BL; Hong O; Raymond DM
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 14501543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Influencing factors for hearing loss in workers exposed to noise in a cement plant].
    Wang XM; Wu H; Jiao J; Li YH; Zhang ZR; Zhou WH; Yu SF
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 34(12):895-899. PubMed ID: 28241676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment.
    Reynolds JL; Royster LH; Pearson RG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Aug; 51(8):437-46. PubMed ID: 2392973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is there a relationship between occupational noise and hearing levels, sleep quality, and QoL of the factory workers?
    Demirtaş H; Saygun M; Bayar Muluk N
    Neurol Sci; 2022 Feb; 43(2):1015-1023. PubMed ID: 34236555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Use of the Kurtosis-Adjusted Cumulative Noise Exposure Metric in Evaluating the Hearing Loss Risk for Complex Noise.
    Xie HW; Qiu W; Heyer NJ; Zhang MB; Zhang P; Zhao YM; Hamernik RP
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 26671317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating the Effect of Training Along With Fit Testing on Premolded Earplug Users in a Chinese Petrochemical Plant.
    Liu Y; Gong W; Liu X; Li L
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):838-846. PubMed ID: 31584503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cochrane method for systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss - abridged.
    Tikka C; Verbeek J; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler W; Ferrite S
    Codas; 2020; 32(2):e20190127. PubMed ID: 32267337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.