These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34281318)

  • 21. Bacterial contamination of surgical suture resembles a biofilm.
    Henry-Stanley MJ; Hess DJ; Barnes AM; Dunny GM; Wells CL
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2010 Oct; 11(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 20673144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bacterial adhesion to suture material in a contaminated wound model: Comparison of monofilament, braided, and barbed sutures.
    Dhom J; Bloes DA; Peschel A; Hofmann UK
    J Orthop Res; 2017 Apr; 35(4):925-933. PubMed ID: 27208547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characteristics of Suture Materials Used in Oral Surgery: Systematic Review.
    Faris A; Khalid L; Hashim M; Yaghi S; Magde T; Bouresly W; Hamdoon Z; Uthman AT; Marei H; Al-Rawi N
    Int Dent J; 2022 Jun; 72(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 35305815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Sutures in dentistry. Traditional and PTFE materials].
    La Scala G; Lleo MM
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Sep; 58(14):54-8, 61. PubMed ID: 2279592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The choice of a suture to close abdominal incisions.
    Bucknall TE; Teare L; Ellis H
    Eur Surg Res; 1983; 15(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 6303791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical and microbiological comparison of knotless/barbed and silk sutures for impacted third-molar surgery.
    Uysal AE; Sencimen M; Ozkan A; Hosbul T; Samur Erguven S; Parlak F
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2023 Aug; 72(4):161-167. PubMed ID: 36951010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC; Kizil Z
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bacterial adherence to high--tensile strength sutures.
    Masini BD; Stinner DJ; Waterman SM; Wenke JC
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Jun; 27(6):834-8. PubMed ID: 21624678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Antibacterial suture vs silk for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. A randomized clinical study.
    Sala-Pérez S; López-Ramírez M; Quinteros-Borgarello M; Valmaseda-Castellón E; Gay-Escoda C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2016 Jan; 21(1):e95-102. PubMed ID: 26615503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tissue reactions to sutures in the presence and absence of anti-infective therapy.
    Leknes KN; Selvig KA; Bøe OE; Wikesjö UM
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 15691341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection.
    Katz S; Izhar M; Mirelman D
    Ann Surg; 1981 Jul; 194(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 7018429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Antimicrobial coating of spider silk to prevent bacterial attachment on silk surgical sutures.
    Franco AR; Fernandes EM; Rodrigues MT; Rodrigues FJ; Gomes ME; Leonor IB; Kaplan DL; Reis RL
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Nov; 99():236-246. PubMed ID: 31505301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative study of physical properties of three suture materials: silk, e-PTFE (Gore-Tex), and PLA/PGA (Vicryl).
    Charbit Y; Hitzig C; Bolla M; Bitton C; Bertrand MF
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1999; 33(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 10067182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of the fracture morphology of polyamide, polyester, polypropylene, and silk sutures before and after implantation in vivo.
    Karaca E; Hockenberger AS
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Nov; 87(2):580-9. PubMed ID: 18506829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Capillary activity of surgical sutures and suture-dependent bacterial transport: a qualitative study.
    Geiger D; Debus ES; Ziegler UE; Larena-Avellaneda A; Frosch M; Thiede A; Dietz UA
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2005; 6(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 16433602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bacterial colonization on different suture materials--a potential risk for intraoral dentoalveolar surgery.
    Otten JE; Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M; Jahnke H; Pelz K
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Jul; 74(1):627-35. PubMed ID: 15889436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Oral tissue reactions to suture materials.
    Selvig KA; Biagiotti GR; Leknes KN; Wikesjö UM
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Oct; 18(5):474-87. PubMed ID: 10093524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination?
    Edmiston CE; Seabrook GR; Goheen MP; Krepel CJ; Johnson CP; Lewis BD; Brown KR; Towne JB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17000391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical and histological comparison of polyglycolic acid suture with black silk suture after minor oral surgical procedure.
    Balamurugan R; Mohamed M; Pandey V; Katikaneni HK; Kumar KR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 23151703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.