168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34281886)
1. Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Combined Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Approach in Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
Kubo-Kaneda M; Kondo E; Nimura R; Maki S; Nii M; Yoshida K; Ikeda T
Anticancer Res; 2021 Aug; 41(8):4151-4155. PubMed ID: 34281886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Pakish J; Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Westin SN; Schmeler KM; Reis RD; Munsell MF; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 24361579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extraperitoneal laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial carcinoma staging: an approach with higher efficiency.
Zhang W; Xia L; Han X; Ju X; Wu X; Chen X
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 19(1):323. PubMed ID: 34743715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning curve of laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma: A cumulative sum analysis.
Yoshida H; Yamamoto M; Shigeta H
Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 35():254-260. PubMed ID: 32932223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers.
Malinowski A; Majchrzak-Baczmańska D; Pogoda K; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Antosiak B
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 23700847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-port laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy as part of staging operation for early ovarian cancer and high grade endometrial cancer.
Lee YS
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 May; 27(3):e32. PubMed ID: 27029753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Laparoscopic ways of para-aortic lymphadenectomy].
Estrade JP; Lazard A; Gurriet B; Agostini A; Blanc B
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Feb; 38(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 20122863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer].
He H; Yang Z; Zhang J; Yao D; Fan J; Zhao R; Zeng D; Hu X; Lin Z; Jiang Y; Li L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):902-9. PubMed ID: 26887873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients.
Hudry D; Ahmad S; Zanagnolo V; Narducci F; Fastrez M; Ponce J; Tucher E; Lécuru F; Conri V; Leguevaque P; Goffin F; Holloway RW; Lambaudie E;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25628104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Bebia V; Hernández A; Gilabert-Estalles J; Franco-Camps S; de la Torre J; Segrist J; Chipirliu A; Cabrera S; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 33160695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: Technique and surgical outcomes.
Doğan Durdağ G; Alemdaroğlu S; Yılmaz Baran Ş; Alkaş Yağınç D; Yüksel Şimşek S; Çelik H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 50(5):101917. PubMed ID: 32961327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of laparoscopic, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of endometrial carcinoma.
Wang H; Li W; Li N
J BUON; 2021; 26(5):1796-1801. PubMed ID: 34761585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
