200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34281951)
41. A Retrospective Comparative Study of Long-Term Outcomes Following Cervical Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
Eseonu K; Laurent E; Bishi H; Raja H; Ravi K; Dannawi Z
Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32399. PubMed ID: 36636537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?
Chang PY; Chang HK; Wu JC; Huang WC; Fay LY; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):577-585. PubMed ID: 28291414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Porous titanium cervical interbody fusion device in the treatment of degenerative cervical radiculopathy; 1-year results of a prospective controlled trial.
Arts M; Torensma B; Wolfs J
Spine J; 2020 Jul; 20(7):1065-1072. PubMed ID: 32205276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Ten-year Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement With the BRYAN Cervical Disc: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.
Lavelle WF; Riew KD; Levi AD; Florman JE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 May; 44(9):601-608. PubMed ID: 30325888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing stem cells (Trinity Evolution® Viable Cellular Bone Matrix) in patients undergoing two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Peppers TA; Bullard DE; Vanichkachorn JS; Stanley SK; Arnold PM; Waldorff EI; Hahn R; Atkinson BL; Ryaby JT; Linovitz RJ
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 12(1):67. PubMed ID: 28446192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome.
Meisel HJ; Jurák L; Antinheimo J; Arregui R; Bruchmann B; Čabraja M; Caroli F; Kroppenstedt S; Kryl J; Pohjola J; Shackleford I; Sola S; Stosberg P; Stulik J; Woiciechowsky C; Suchomel P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 27258476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
Vaccaro A; Beutler W; Peppelman W; Marzluff JM; Highsmith J; Mugglin A; DeMuth G; Gudipally M; Baker KJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2227-39. PubMed ID: 24335629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.
Njoku I; Alimi M; Leng LZ; Shin BJ; James AR; Bhangoo S; Tsiouris AJ; Härtl R
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 25105338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Loumeau TP; Darden BV; Kesman TJ; Odum SM; Van Doren BA; Laxer EB; Murrey DB
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2263-70. PubMed ID: 26869078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Segmental Motion of the Cervical Spine After Total Disc Replacement Using ActivC Versus Discectomy and Fusion Using Stand-alone Cage.
Kim BJ; Kim SH; Lee SH; Ha SK; Kim SD; Lim DJ
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e1228-e1234. PubMed ID: 30885861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Are PEEK-on-Ceramic Bearings an Option for Total Disc Arthroplasty? An In Vitro Tribology Study.
Siskey R; Ciccarelli L; Lui MK; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2428-2440. PubMed ID: 27677290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Results at 24 months from the prospective, randomized, multicenter Investigational Device Exemption trial of ProDisc-C versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with 4-year follow-up and continued access patients.
Delamarter RB; Murrey D; Janssen ME; Goldstein JA; Zigler J; Tay BK; Darden B
SAS J; 2010; 4(4):122-8. PubMed ID: 25802660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.
Janssen ME; Zigler JE; Spivak JM; Delamarter RB; Darden BV; Kopjar B
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(21):1738-47. PubMed ID: 26537161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Hybrid Total Disc Replacement for Bilevel Pathology with Cervical Radiculopathy/Myelopathy: A Comparative Study with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up in an Indian Population.
Sharma JK; Varma KKK; Mallepally AR; Marathe N; Rustagi T; Mohapatra B; Yadav P; Das K
Asian Spine J; 2022 Aug; 16(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 34784703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Anakwenze OA; Auerbach JD; Milby AH; Lonner BS; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2001-7. PubMed ID: 19730207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical Outcomes of Outpatient Cervical Total Disc Replacement Compared With Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
Chin KR; Pencle FJR; Seale JA; Pencle FK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 May; 42(10):E567-E574. PubMed ID: 27755491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Sasso RC; Anderson PA; Riew KD; Heller JG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(18):1684-92. PubMed ID: 21938372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed Using a CaO-SiO
Park J; Park SM; Ham DW; Hong JY; Kim HJ; Yeom JS
J Clin Med; 2023 Jun; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 37373762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
