BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34282649)

  • 1. Determining Medical Urgency of Voice Disorders Using Auditory-Perceptual Voice Assessments Performed by Speech-Language Pathologists.
    Fujiki RB; Sanders PW; Sivasankar MP; Halum S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2022 Jun; 131(6):579-586. PubMed ID: 34282649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can Resident Auditory-Perceptual Voice Assessments Predict Medical Urgency of Voice Disorders?
    Fujiki RB; Sanders PW; Anthony BP; Parker NP; Sivasankar MP; Halum S
    J Voice; 2024 Jan; 38(1):181-188. PubMed ID: 34479778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the Accuracy of Medical Diagnoses Affect Novice Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Dysphonia Severity?
    Sauder C; Eadie T
    J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 30195410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory-perceptual Assessment of Healthy and Disordered Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.
    Contreras-Ruston F; Guzman M; Castillo-Allendes A; Cantor-Cutiva L; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):654-659. PubMed ID: 34903393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V.
    Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):e7-14. PubMed ID: 20430573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of Terminology and the Effect of Training on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Speaking Voice by Singing Teachers.
    Walstrom A; Brehm SB; LeBorgne WD; Acord A; Gottliebson RO
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):543.e1-543.e11. PubMed ID: 34782224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
    Helou LB; Solomon NP; Henry LR; Coppit GL; Howard RS; Stojadinovic A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Aug; 19(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20484704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.
    Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
    J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e1-948.e9. PubMed ID: 30076095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of Foreign Language Accent on Expert Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Evaluations of Dysphonia.
    Marks KL; Dahl KL; Stepp CE
    Laryngoscope; 2024 May; 134(5):2272-2276. PubMed ID: 37942827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Russian language].
    Choynzonov EL; Kononova LA; Krasavina EA; Kulbakin DE; Mukhina VI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2022; 87(5):34-38. PubMed ID: 36404688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language.
    Kishore Pebbili G; Shabnam S; Pushpavathi M; Rashmi J; Gopi Sankar R; Nethra R; Shreya S; Shashish G
    J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):159.e11-159.e18. PubMed ID: 31543357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
    Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual Error Identification of Human and Synthesized Voices.
    Englert M; Madazio G; Gielow I; Lucero J; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):639.e17-23. PubMed ID: 26337775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cepstral and Perceptual Investigations of Voice in Speech and Language Pathologists with Vocal Fatigue.
    Nayebian R; Darouie A; Hasanvand A; Vahedi M
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Dec; 75(4):3696-3702. PubMed ID: 37974796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
    Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between the GIRBAS Scale and the Acoustic and Aerodynamic Measures Provided by EVA for the Assessment of Dysphonia following Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis.
    Morsomme D; Jamart J; Wéry C; Giovanni A; Remacle M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(6):317-25. PubMed ID: 11721138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders.
    Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; de Souza GS; Hachiya A; Tsuji DH
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e7-765.e11. PubMed ID: 26627119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice Outcomes After Radiation for Early-Stage Laryngeal Cancer.
    Naunheim MR; Garneau J; Park C; Carroll L; Goldberg L; Woo P
    J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):460-464. PubMed ID: 30611594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.