These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34283345)

  • 41. Ethical review of research protocols: experience of a research ethics committee.
    Martín-Arribas MC; Rodríguez-Lozano I; Arias-Díaz J
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2012 Jun; 65(6):525-9. PubMed ID: 22464100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
    NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
    Branson R
    J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Animal ethical committees.
    Britt D
    Altern Lab Anim; 1994; 22(3):141-2. PubMed ID: 11654113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Ethical assessment of biomedical experiments in The Netherlands].
    Noach EL
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 1995; 57(3):158-79; discussion 179-82. PubMed ID: 7483813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An assessment of institutional review committees in human experimentation.
    Gray BH
    Med Care; 1975 Apr; 13(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 1091788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The ethics of psychological research. Part I. General ethical considerations: Some recent ethical concerns of psychologists in Britain.
    Blackman DE
    Soc Sci Med F; 1981 Mar; 15F(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11661963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reviewing the Review: A Pilot Study of the Ethical Review Process of Animal Research in Sweden.
    Jörgensen S; Lindsjö J; Weber EM; Röcklinsberg H
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33807898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The moral imperatives of medical research in human subjects.
    Lieberman JA; Sloan J
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 11653319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Keeping research subjects out of harm's way.
    Ellis GB
    JAMA; 1999 Nov; 282(20):1963-5. PubMed ID: 10580465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ethics committees and paediatric research: a personal viewpoint.
    Pearn J
    Aust Paediatr J; 1987 Apr; 23(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 3619787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.
    Edgar H; Rothman DJ
    Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ethics committees for clinical experimentation at international level with a focus on Italy.
    Naureen Z; Beccari T; Marks RS; Brown R; Lorusso L; Pheby D; Miertus S; Herbst KL; Stuppia L; Henehan G; Falsini B; Lumer L; Dundar M; Bertelli M; Study Group IB
    Acta Biomed; 2020 Nov; 91(13-S):e2020016. PubMed ID: 33170165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Standards for research ethics committees: purpose, problems and the possibilities of other approaches.
    Davies H; Wells F; Czarkowski M
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):382-3. PubMed ID: 19482984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reviewing research involving children: the practice of British research ethics committees.
    Hall D
    IRB; 1988; 10(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Conceptualizations of fairness and legitimacy in the context of Ethiopian health priority setting: Reflections on the applicability of accountability for reasonableness.
    Petricca K; Bekele A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 28544136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluating the ethical acceptability of animal research.
    Bout HJ; Fentener van Vlissingen JM; Karssing ED
    Lab Anim (NY); 2014 Nov; 43(11):411-4. PubMed ID: 25333594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Refining Value Sensitive Design: A (Capability-Based) Procedural Ethics Approach to Technological Design for Well-Being.
    Cenci A; Cawthorne D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Oct; 26(5):2629-2662. PubMed ID: 32424724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The ethical judgment of animal research.
    Galvin SL; Herzog HA
    Ethics Behav; 1992; 2(4):263-86. PubMed ID: 11651614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The institutional review board as a mirror of scientific and ethical standards.
    Rosnow RL; Rotheram-Borus MJ; Ceci SJ; Blanck PD; Koocher GP
    Am Psychol; 1993 Jul; 48(7):821-6. PubMed ID: 8357107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.