BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34284086)

  • 1. Motivational factors controlling flavor preference learning and performance: Effects of preexposure with nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners.
    Gil M; de Brugada I; Hall G
    Behav Processes; 2021 Oct; 191():104462. PubMed ID: 34284086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does drinking saccharin weaken an association of sweet with calories? Pre-exposure effects in flavor preference learning.
    González A; Boakes R; Hall G; de Brugada I
    Physiol Behav; 2023 Dec; 272():114381. PubMed ID: 37866642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Saccharin Taste Conditions Flavor Preference in Weanling Rats.
    Ueji K; Minematsu Y; Takeshita D; Yamamoto T
    Chem Senses; 2016 Feb; 41(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 26514409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motivational control of latent inhibition in flavor preference conditioning.
    Garcia-Burgos D; González F; Hall G
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():9-17. PubMed ID: 23624026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.
    Sclafani A; Clare RA
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jul; 29(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 15269124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abnormal taste preference for saccharin in hypothyroid rats.
    Gordon BH; Wong GY; Liu J; Rivlin RS
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Aug; 52(2):385-8. PubMed ID: 1523267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US-preexposure effects in flavor-preference and flavor-aversion learning with nonnutritive USs.
    Gil M; Recio SA; de Brugada I; Symonds M; Hall G
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():67-73. PubMed ID: 24811451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditioned preference for sweet stimuli in OLETF rat: effects of food deprivation.
    De Jonghe BC; Hajnal A; Covasa M
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2007 May; 292(5):R1819-27. PubMed ID: 17272669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Latent inhibition in flavor-preference conditioning: effects of motivational state and the nature of the reinforcer.
    González F; Morillas E; Hall G
    Learn Behav; 2015 Dec; 43(4):376-83. PubMed ID: 26077443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prior exposure to nutritive and artificial sweeteners differentially alters the magnitude and persistence of sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and C57BL/6 inbred mouse strains.
    LaMagna S; Olsson K; Warshaw D; Fazilov G; Iskhakov B; Buras A; Bodnar RJ
    Nutr Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 22(10):706-717. PubMed ID: 29415638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drinking saccharin increases food intake and preference--III. Sensory and associative factors.
    Tordoff MG; Friedman MI
    Appetite; 1989 Feb; 12(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 2719472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of caloric or non-caloric sweetener long-term consumption on taste preferences and new aversive learning.
    Vera-Rivera G; Miranda MI; Rangel-Hernández JA; Badillo-Juárez D; Fregoso-Urrutia D; Caynas-Rojas S
    Nutr Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 23(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 29862893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monosodium glutamate and sweet taste: generalization of conditioned taste aversion between glutamate and sweet stimuli in rats.
    Heyer BR; Taylor-Burds CC; Tran LH; Delay ER
    Chem Senses; 2003 Sep; 28(7):631-41. PubMed ID: 14578125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of gustatory and postingestive actions of sweeteners in the generation of positive affect as evaluated by place preference conditioning.
    Agmo A; Marroquin E
    Appetite; 1997 Dec; 29(3):269-89. PubMed ID: 9468761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential patterns of opioid and dopamine D1 receptor antagonism on nutritive and non-nutritive sweetener intakes in C57BL/6:129 hybrid mice relative to inbred C57BL/6 and 129 mice.
    Roland M; Berglas E; Pines R; Carata I; Castillo A; Nashed M; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2023 Feb; 223():173514. PubMed ID: 36642390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Package Visual Cues of Sweeteners on the Sensory-Emotional Profiles of Their Products.
    Wardy W; Chonpracha P; Chokumnoyporn N; Sriwattana S; Prinyawiwatkul W; Jirangrat W
    J Food Sci; 2017 Feb; 82(2):500-508. PubMed ID: 28071796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motivational state regulates the content of learned flavor preferences.
    Harris JA; Gorissen MC; Bailey GK; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Jan; 26(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 10650541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium.
    Dess NK; Dobson K; Roberts BT; Chapman CD
    Chem Senses; 2017 Jun; 42(5):381-392. PubMed ID: 28334357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.