BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34284417)

  • 1. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection techniques of large colorectal lesions: experience of a referral center in Italy.
    Papparella LG; Barbaro F; Pecere S; Gibiino G; Burrelli Scotti G; Napoli M; Boskoski I; Petruzziello L; Costamagna G
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Apr; 34(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 34284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm.
    Terasaki M; Tanaka S; Oka S; Nakadoi K; Takata S; Kanao H; Yoshida S; Chayama K
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Apr; 27(4):734-40. PubMed ID: 22098630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection in the Colorectum.
    Ham NS; Kim J; Oh EH; Hwang SW; Park SH; Yang DH; Ye BD; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Byeon JS
    Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Apr; 65(4):969-977. PubMed ID: 31493041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection.
    Suzuki T; Kitagawa Y; Nankinzan R; Hara T; Yamaguchi T
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2019; 82(3):375-378. PubMed ID: 31566324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large (20-30 mm) flat colorectal lesions.
    Oh CK; Cho YW; Choi IH; Lee HH; Lim CH; Kim JS; Lee BI; Cho YS
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Mar; 37(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 34845766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a rescue treatment in difficult colorectal ESD cases.
    Okamoto K; Muguruma N; Kagemoto K; Mitsui Y; Fujimoto D; Kitamura S; Kimura T; Sogabe M; Miyamoto H; Takayama T
    Dig Endosc; 2017 Apr; 29 Suppl 2():45-52. PubMed ID: 28425649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: Prospective, multicenter, cohort trial.
    Kobayashi N; Takeuchi Y; Ohata K; Igarashi M; Yamada M; Kodashima S; Hotta K; Harada K; Ikematsu H; Uraoka T; Sakamoto N; Doyama H; Abe T; Katagiri A; Hori S; Michida T; Yamaguchi T; Fukuzawa M; Kiriyama S; Fukase K; Murakami Y; Ishikawa H; Saito Y
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Jul; 34(5):1042-1051. PubMed ID: 34963034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining eastern and western practices for safe and effective endoscopic resection of large complex colorectal lesions.
    Emmanuel A; Gulati S; Burt M; Hayee B; Haji A
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 May; 30(5):506-513. PubMed ID: 29406437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for high-grade dysplasia and early-stage carcinoma in the colorectum.
    Chen T; Qin WZ; Yao LQ; Zhong YS; Zhang YQ; Chen WF; Hu JW; Ooi M; Chen LL; Hou YY; Xu MD; Zhou PH
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Mar; 38(1):3. PubMed ID: 29764504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection
    Shahini E; Passera R; Lo Secco G; Arezzo A
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Aug; 31(6):835-847. PubMed ID: 35112654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term Outcomes After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Trial From Japan.
    Ohata K; Kobayashi N; Sakai E; Takeuchi Y; Chino A; Takamaru H; Kodashima S; Hotta K; Harada K; Ikematsu H; Uraoka T; Murakami T; Tsuji S; Abe T; Katagiri A; Hori S; Michida T; Suzuki T; Fukuzawa M; Kiriyama S; Fukase K; Murakami Y; Ishikawa H; Saito Y
    Gastroenterology; 2022 Nov; 163(5):1423-1434.e2. PubMed ID: 35810779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review.
    De Ceglie A; Hassan C; Mangiavillano B; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Ridola L; Bhandari P; Boeri F; Conio M
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2016 Aug; 104():138-55. PubMed ID: 27370173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
    Backes Y; Moons LM; van Bergeijk JD; Berk L; Ter Borg F; Ter Borg PC; Elias SG; Geesing JM; Groen JN; Hadithi M; Hardwick JC; Kerkhof M; Mangen MJ; Straathof JW; Schröder R; Schwartz MP; Spanier BW; de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Wolfhagen FH; Koch AD
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 16(1):56. PubMed ID: 27229709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.
    Saito Y; Fukuzawa M; Matsuda T; Fukunaga S; Sakamoto T; Uraoka T; Nakajima T; Ikehara H; Fu KI; Itoi T; Fujii T
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Feb; 24(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 19517168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic submucosal dissection or piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection for large superficial colorectal lesions: A cost effectiveness study.
    Stéphane S; Timothée W; Jérémie A; Raphael O; Martin D; Emmanuelle P; Elodie L; Quentin D; Nikki C; Sonia B; Hugo L; Guillaume G; Romain L; Mathieu P; Sophie G; Jeremie J
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2022; 46(6):101969. PubMed ID: 35659602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors for local recurrence and appropriate surveillance interval after endoscopic resection.
    Komeda Y; Watanabe T; Sakurai T; Kono M; Okamoto K; Nagai T; Takenaka M; Hagiwara S; Matsui S; Nishida N; Tsuji N; Kashida H; Kudo M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(12):1502-1512. PubMed ID: 30948913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Matched case-control study comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors.
    Kobayashi N; Yoshitake N; Hirahara Y; Konishi J; Saito Y; Matsuda T; Ishikawa T; Sekiguchi R; Fujimori T
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Apr; 27(4):728-33. PubMed ID: 22004124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20-30 mm colorectal polyps.
    Inoue T; Nakagawa K; Yamasaki Y; Shichijo S; Kanesaka T; Maekawa A; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Takeuchi Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2549-2557. PubMed ID: 33724540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resection outcomes and recurrence rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and hybrid ESD for colorectal tumors in a single Italian center.
    Milano RV; Viale E; Bartel MJ; Notaristefano C; Testoni PA
    Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2328-2339. PubMed ID: 29098434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal neoplasms.
    Imai K; Hotta K; Yamaguchi Y; Ito S; Ono H
    Dig Endosc; 2017 Apr; 29 Suppl 2():53-57. PubMed ID: 28425660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.