357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34284794)
1. Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.
Gormley R; Vickers B; Cheng B; Norman WV
Reprod Health; 2021 Jul; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 34284794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing options for women seeking permanent contraception in high-resource countries: a protocol for a systematic review.
Gormley R; Vickers B; Norman WV
Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 8(1):74. PubMed ID: 30914067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception.
Black A; Guilbert E; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman W; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; Mansouri S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):182-222. PubMed ID: 27032746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.
McMartin K
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2013; 13(21):1-35. PubMed ID: 24228084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Nov; 37(11):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26629725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Oct; 37(10):936-42. PubMed ID: 26606712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Intrauterine Contraception and Tubal Ligation.
Schwarz EB; Lewis CA; Dove MS; Murphy E; Zuckerman D; Nunez-Eddy C; Tancredi DJ; McDonald-Mosley R; Sonalkar S; Hathaway M; Gariepy AM
J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Dec; 37(16):4168-4175. PubMed ID: 35194746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: a health economic literature review.
Toronto Health Economic and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2013; 13(22):1-25. PubMed ID: 24228085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.
Lawrie TA; Kulier R; Nardin JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD003034. PubMed ID: 27494193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Salpingectomy, tubal ligation and hysteroscopic occlusion for sterilization.
Marchand GJ; Masoud AT; King AK; Brazil GM; Ulibarri HM; Parise JE; Arroyo AL; Coriell CL; Goetz SP; Moir CJ; Govindan ML
Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 74(5):452-461. PubMed ID: 35912465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.
Lawrie TA; Kulier R; Nardin JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD003034. PubMed ID: 26343930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT.
Dreyer K; Lier MC; Emanuel MH; Twisk JW; Mol BW; Schats R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2005-16. PubMed ID: 27209341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Conz L; Mota BS; Bahamondes L; Teixeira Dória M; Françoise Mauricette Derchain S; Rieira R; Sarian LO
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Aug; 99(8):970-982. PubMed ID: 31990981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Update on permanent contraception options for women.
Patil E; Jensen JT
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 27(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 26406934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Lethaby A; Hussain M; Rishworth JR; Rees MC
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; (4):CD002126. PubMed ID: 25924648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regret in the Modern Contraceptive Landscape: Evaluating Regret in Patients Undergoing Tubal Ligation or Bilateral Salpingectomy for Contraception.
Rodowa MS; Waddington A; Pudwell J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2024 May; 46(5):102362. PubMed ID: 38272216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for sterilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mills K; Marchand G; Sainz K; Azadi A; Ware K; Vallejo J; Anderson S; King A; Osborn A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Cieminski K; Hopewell S; Rials L; Klipp A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):258-265.e4. PubMed ID: 32941790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
