156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34285350)
21. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preoperative combined nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific membrane antigen does not correlate with pathologic stage or biochemical failure in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Thomas J; Gupta M; Grasso Y; Reddy CA; Heston WD; Zippe C; Dreicer R; Kupelian PA; Brainard J; Levin HS; Klein EA
J Clin Oncol; 2002 Aug; 20(15):3213-8. PubMed ID: 12149293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy core details to predict oncological outcome in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Yashi M; Nukui A; Tokura Y; Takei K; Suzuki I; Sakamoto K; Yuki H; Kambara T; Betsunoh H; Abe H; Fukabori Y; Nakazato Y; Kaji Y; Kamai T
BMC Urol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 28645325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in defining biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Fondurulia J; Chen MH; Tomaszewski JE; Renshaw AA; Wein A; Richie JP
J Clin Oncol; 2000 Mar; 18(6):1164-72. PubMed ID: 10715284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score Predicts Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy and Adverse Surgical Pathology in a Racially Diverse Population of Men with Clinically Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Cullen J; Rosner IL; Brand TC; Zhang N; Tsiatis AC; Moncur J; Ali A; Chen Y; Knezevic D; Maddala T; Lawrence HJ; Febbo PG; Srivastava S; Sesterhenn IA; McLeod DG
Eur Urol; 2015 Jul; 68(1):123-31. PubMed ID: 25465337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies.
Martin DT; Ghabili K; Levi A; Humphrey PA; Sprenkle PC
Urology; 2019 Mar; 125():64-72. PubMed ID: 30552940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.
Godtman RA; Holmberg E; Khatami A; Stranne J; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 22980443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prostate cancer outcomes for men who present with symptoms at diagnosis.
Beckmann KR; O'Callaghan ME; Ruseckaite R; Kinnear N; Miller C; Evans S; Roder DM; Moretti K;
BJU Int; 2017 Jun; 119(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 27489140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.
Fossati N; Karnes RJ; Cozzarini C; Fiorino C; Gandaglia G; Joniau S; Boorjian SA; Goldner G; Hinkelbein W; Haustermans K; Tombal B; Shariat S; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):728-733. PubMed ID: 26497924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessing the relationship between statin use and oncologic outcomes among men electing active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.
Nyame YA; Wilkins L; Greene DJ; Ganesan V; Dai C; Almassi N; Stephenson AJ; Gong M; Berglund R; Klein EA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):617-623. PubMed ID: 30996285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term radical prostatectomy outcomes among participants from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Rotterdam.
Loeb S; Zhu X; Schroder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1678-83. PubMed ID: 22998182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of a Genomic Classifier for Predicting Post-Prostatectomy Recurrence in a Community Based Health Care Setting.
Glass AG; Leo MC; Haddad Z; Yousefi K; du Plessis M; Chen C; Choeurng V; Abdollah F; Robbins B; Ra S; Richert-Boe KE; Buerki C; Pearson K; Davicioni E; Weinmann S
J Urol; 2016 Jun; 195(6):1748-53. PubMed ID: 26626216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score assay as a predictor of biochemical recurrence in men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer.
Helfand BT; Paterakos M; Wang CH; Talaty P; Abran J; Bennett J; Hall DW; Lehman A; Aboushwareb T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0273782. PubMed ID: 36048818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical utility of percent-positive prostate biopsies in predicting biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Silver B; Henry L; Hurwitz M; Kaplan I; Beard CJ; Tomaszewski JE; Renshaw AA; Wein A; Richie JP
Mol Urol; 2000; 4(3):171-5;discussion 177. PubMed ID: 11062371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing High-Intensity Focal Ultrasound Hemiablation to Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Unilateral Prostate Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis.
Albisinni S; Aoun F; Bellucci S; Biaou I; Limani K; Hawaux E; Peltier A; van Velthoven R
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 27799004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minimal impact of clinical stage on prostate cancer prognosis among contemporary patients with clinically localized disease.
Reese AC; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 20478578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz B; Schnall M; Schultz D; Cote K; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
J Urol; 2000 Sep; 164(3 Pt 1):759-63. PubMed ID: 10953141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical utility of percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer cutpoints to risk stratify patients before radical prostatectomy.
Freedland SJ; Csathy GS; Dorey F; Aronson WJ
Urology; 2002 Jul; 60(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 12100929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of a 22-Gene Genomic Classifier in Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer: An Ancillary Study of the NRG/RTOG 9601 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Feng FY; Huang HC; Spratt DE; Zhao SG; Sandler HM; Simko JP; Davicioni E; Nguyen PL; Pollack A; Efstathiou JA; Dicker AP; Todorovic T; Margrave J; Liu YS; Dabbas B; Thompson DJS; Das R; Dignam JJ; Sweeney C; Attard G; Bahary JP; Lukka HR; Hall WA; Pisansky TM; Shah AB; Pugh SL; Shipley WU; Tran PT
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Apr; 7(4):544-552. PubMed ID: 33570548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
