275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34287739)
21. Prognostic value of total metabolic tumour volume and therapy-response assessment by [
Annovazzi A; Ferraresi V; Rea S; Russillo M; Renna D; Carpano S; Sciuto R
Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3398-3407. PubMed ID: 34779873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predictive value of early 18F-FDG PET/CT studies for treatment response evaluation to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: preliminary results of an ongoing study.
Sachpekidis C; Larribere L; Pan L; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Hassel JC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Mar; 42(3):386-96. PubMed ID: 25359635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. FDG PET/CT for tumoral and systemic immune response monitoring of advanced melanoma during first-line combination ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment.
Iravani A; Osman MM; Weppler AM; Wallace R; Galligan A; Lasocki A; Hunter MO; Akhurst T; Hofman MS; Lau PKH; Kee D; Au-Yeung G; Sandhu S; Hicks RJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Nov; 47(12):2776-2786. PubMed ID: 32338306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. What
Turgeon GA; Iravani A; Akhurst T; Beaulieu A; Callahan JW; Bressel M; Cole AJ; Everitt SJ; Siva S; Hicks RJ; Ball DL; Mac Manus MP
J Nucl Med; 2019 Mar; 60(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 30030343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of prognostic value of different metabolic response criteria determined by PET/CT in patients with metastatic breast cancer under CDK 4/6 inhibitor treatment.
Önner H; Eren OÖ; Körez MK; Yilmaz F; Kara Gedik G
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2023; 42(5):319-324. PubMed ID: 37030597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Predictive Value of FDG PET/CT for Determining Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Stage III-IV BRAF -Mutated Melanoma Patients Treated With Targeted Therapy-What Can Be Learned From Progression?
van der Hiel B; Aalbersberg EA; van den Eertwegh AJM; de Wit-van der Veen LJ; Stokkel MPM; Lopez-Yurda M; Boellaard R; Kapiteijn EW; Hospers GAP; Aarts MJB; de Vos FYFL; Boers-Sonderen MJ; van der Veldt AAM; de Groot JWB; Haanen JBAG
Clin Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 49(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 38113329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using positron emission tomography (PET) response criteria in solid tumours (PERCIST) 1.0 for evaluation of 2'-deoxy-2'-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose-PET/CT scans to predict survival early during treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Fledelius J; Khalil AA; Hjorthaug K; Frøkiaer J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 26678718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of tumor response to definitive chemoradiotherapy and prognosis prediction in patients with esophageal cancer judged by PET response criteria in solid tumors: multicenter study in Japan.
Kitajima K; Kaida H; Nakatani K; Ishibashi M; Morita T; Nakajo M; Tamaki Y; Minamimoto R
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 May; 41(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 32187159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of tumor response to chemoradiotherapy and predicting prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by PERCIST.
Katsuura T; Kitajima K; Fujiwara M; Terada T; Uwa N; Noguchi K; Doi H; Tamaki Y; Yoshida R; Tsuchitani T; Fujita M; Yamakado K
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Aug; 32(7):453-462. PubMed ID: 29858797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The early prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis: comparison of PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria in breast cancer.
Lian W; Liu C; Gu B; Zhang J; Lu L; Pan H; Yao Z; Wang M; Song S; Zhang Y; Yang Z
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Mar; 41(3):280-287. PubMed ID: 32032193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 3'-Deoxy-3'-
Kim JE; Chae SY; Kim JH; Kim HJ; Kim TW; Kim KP; Kim SY; Lee JL; Oh SJ; Kim JS; Ryu JS; Moon DH; Hong YS
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(8):1713-1722. PubMed ID: 31041456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Role of PET/CT in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: State of Art.
Castello A; Lopci E
Curr Radiopharm; 2020; 13(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 31749440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predictive value and accuracy of [
Ayati N; Jamshidi-Araghi Z; Hoellwerth M; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Hitzl W; Koelblinger P; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jul; 50(9):2715-2726. PubMed ID: 37140669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predicting tumor response and outcome of second-look surgery with
Aide N; Fauchille P; Coquan E; Ferron G; Combe P; Meunier J; Alexandre J; Berton D; Leary A; De Rauglaudre G; Bonichon N; Pujade Lauraine E; Joly F
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jun; 48(6):1998-2008. PubMed ID: 33221969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How Often Do We Fail to Classify the Treatment Response with [
Mattoli MV; Calcagni ML; Taralli S; Indovina L; Spottiswoode BS; Giordano A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 30850971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. TLG-S criteria are superior to both EORTC and PERCIST for predicting outcomes in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib.
Ho KC; Fang YD; Chung HW; Liu YC; Chang JW; Hou MM; Yang CT; Cheng NM; Su TP; Yen TC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Nov; 43(12):2155-2165. PubMed ID: 27260520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective evaluation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography for response evaluation in recurrent carcinoma cervix: does metabolic response predict survival?
Dhull VS; Sharma P; Sharma DN; Maharjan S; Suman Kc S; Patel C; Bal C; Kumar R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 24407578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Response Evaluation and Survival Prediction After PD-1 Immunotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Assessment Methods.
Ayati N; Lee ST; Zakavi SR; Cheng M; Lau WFE; Parakh S; Pathmaraj K; Scott AM
J Nucl Med; 2021 Jul; 62(7):926-933. PubMed ID: 33246978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer judged by PERCIST - multicenter study in Japan.
Kitajima K; Nakatani K; Yamaguchi K; Nakajo M; Tani A; Ishibashi M; Hosoya K; Morita T; Kinoshita T; Kaida H; Miyoshi Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Sep; 45(10):1661-1671. PubMed ID: 29754160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Early Interim FLT PET/CT versus FDG PET/CT with IHP, EORTC, Deauville, and PERCIST Criteria for Early Therapeutic Monitoring.
Minamimoto R; Fayad L; Advani R; Vose J; Macapinlac H; Meza J; Hankins J; Mottaghy F; Juweid M; Quon A
Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 26854705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
