BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34287902)

  • 1. Efficacy of a harvest graft substitute for recession coverage and soft tissue volume augmentation: A randomized controlled trial.
    McGuire MK; Janakievski J; Scheyer ET; Velásquez D; Gunsolley JC; Heard RH; Morelli T
    J Periodontol; 2022 Mar; 93(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 34287902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
    J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 20350159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-Term Results Comparing Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts With Coronally Advanced Flaps for Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Recession Defects.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
    J Periodontol; 2016 Mar; 87(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 26469812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stability of root coverage outcomes at single maxillary gingival recession with loss of interdental attachment: 3-year extension results from a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
    Cairo F; Cortellini P; Tonetti M; Nieri M; Mervelt J; Pagavino G; Pini-Prato GP
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Jun; 42(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 25932592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An exploratory clinical study evaluating safety and performance of a volume-stable collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap for single gingival recession treatment.
    Stefanini M; Mounssif I; Barootchi S; Tavelli L; Wang HL; Zucchelli G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Sep; 24(9):3181-3191. PubMed ID: 32361892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 5-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measurement technology for volumetric comparison of soft tissue changes.
    Zuhr O; Akakpo D; Eickholz P; Vach K; Hürzeler MB; Petsos H;
    J Clin Periodontol; 2021 Jul; 48(7):949-961. PubMed ID: 33847022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronally advanced flap and composite restoration of the enamel with or without connective tissue graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession with non-carious cervical lesion. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Cairo F; Cortellini P; Nieri M; Pilloni A; Barbato L; Pagavino G; Tonetti M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2020 Mar; 47(3):362-371. PubMed ID: 31811742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession with loss of inter-dental attachment. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Cairo F; Cortellini P; Tonetti M; Nieri M; Mervelt J; Cincinelli S; Pini-Prato G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Aug; 39(8):760-8. PubMed ID: 22639845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Cardaropoli D; Tamagnone L; Roffredo A; Gaveglio L
    J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 21721988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collagen matrix biofunctionalized with injectable platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of single gingival recession: A case report.
    Santamaria MP; Rossato A; Ferreira Ferraz LF; Bonafé AC; Miguel MMV; Nunes MP
    Clin Adv Periodontics; 2023 Jun; 13(2):110-114. PubMed ID: 35604088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term comparison of root coverage procedures at single RT2 maxillary gingival recessions: Ten-year extension results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Cairo F; Cortellini P; Barbato L; Masseti L; Mervelt J; Nieri M; Pini Prato GP; Tonetti MS
    J Clin Periodontol; 2023 Apr; 50(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 36644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Aroca S; Molnár B; Windisch P; Gera I; Salvi GE; Nikolidakis D; Sculean A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 40(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 23627374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical efficacy of coronally advanced flap with or without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions in the aesthetic area: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Cairo F; Cortellini P; Pilloni A; Nieri M; Cincinelli S; Amunni F; Pagavino G; Tonetti MS
    J Clin Periodontol; 2016 Oct; 43(10):849-56. PubMed ID: 27329829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Bioresorbable Xenogeneic Peritoneal Membrane vs Connective Tissue Graft in the Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Peter TG; Tadepalli A; Parthasarathy H; Ponnaiyan D; Ramachandran L; Cholan P
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2023 Oct; (7):s244-s254. PubMed ID: 37879061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the efficacy and long-term stability of tunnel technique and coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession: a Meta-analysis.
    Cheng X; Tang R; Ge Z
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 41(4):450-462. PubMed ID: 37474478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions.
    Rebele SF; Zuhr O; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 24708338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
    J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coronally advanced flap versus tunnel technique for the treatment of peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences with the connective tissue graft: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Tavelli L; Majzoub J; Kauffmann F; Rodriguez MV; Mancini L; Chan HL; Kripfgans OD; Giannobile WV; Wang HL; Barootchi S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2023 Jul; 50(7):980-995. PubMed ID: 36935199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 2-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measuring for volumetric comparison of gingival dimensions.
    Zuhr O; Rebele SF; Vach K; Petsos H; Hürzeler MB;
    J Clin Periodontol; 2020 Sep; 47(9):1144-1158. PubMed ID: 32510644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coronally advanced flap alone or with connective tissue graft in the treatment of single gingival recession defects: a long-term randomized clinical trial.
    Kuis D; Sciran I; Lajnert V; Snjaric D; Prpic J; Pezelj-Ribaric S; Bosnjak A
    J Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 84(11):1576-85. PubMed ID: 23432657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.