326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34287939)
21. Simplified quantification of FDG metabolism in tumors using the autoradiographic method is less dependent on the acquisition time than SUV.
Burger IA; Burger C; Berthold T; Buck A
Nucl Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 38(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 21843779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative assessment of linear least-squares, nonlinear least-squares, and Patlak graphical method for regional and local quantitative tracer kinetic modeling in cerebral dynamic
Ben Bouallègue F; Vauchot F; Mariano-Goulart D
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1260-1271. PubMed ID: 30592540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET.
Stahl A; Ott K; Schwaiger M; Weber WA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1471-8. PubMed ID: 15257418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Noninvasive quantification of nonhuman primate dynamic
Chen X; Zhang S; Zhang J; Chen L; Wang R; Zhou Y
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):064005. PubMed ID: 33709956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Parametric Net Influx Rate Images of
Ilan E; Sandström M; Velikyan I; Sundin A; Eriksson B; Lubberink M
J Nucl Med; 2017 May; 58(5):744-749. PubMed ID: 27789716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic FDG PET imaging based on shortened protocols: a virtual clinical study.
Reshtebar N; Hosseini SA; Zhuang M; Sheikhzadeh P
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 47(1):199-213. PubMed ID: 38078995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical application of a population-based input function (PBIF) for a shortened dynamic whole-body FDG-PET/CT protocol in patients with metastatic melanoma treated by immunotherapy.
Pavoine M; Thuillier P; Karakatsanis N; Legoupil D; Amrane K; Floch R; Le Pennec R; Salaün PY; Abgral R; Bourhis D
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Dec; 10(1):79. PubMed ID: 38062278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of dual time point FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules with an initial standard uptake value less than 2.5.
Macdonald K; Searle J; Lyburn I
Clin Radiol; 2011 Mar; 66(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 21295203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Short dynamic FDG-PET imaging protocol for patients with lung cancer.
Torizuka T; Nobezawa S; Momiki S; Kasamatsu N; Kanno T; Yoshikawa E; Futatsubashi M; Okada H; Ouchi Y
Eur J Nucl Med; 2000 Oct; 27(10):1538-42. PubMed ID: 11083544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dual-time point FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules with minimally increased metabolic activity.
Xiu Y; Bhutani C; Dhurairaj T; Yu JQ; Dadparvar S; Reddy S; Kumar R; Yang H; Alavi A; Zhuang H
Clin Nucl Med; 2007 Feb; 32(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 17242561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Non-invasive estimation of the net influx constant using the standardized uptake value for quantification of FDG uptake of tumours.
Sadato N; Tsuchida T; Nakaumra S; Waki A; Uematsu H; Takahashi N; Hayashi N; Yonekura Y; Ishii Y
Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Jun; 25(6):559-64. PubMed ID: 9618569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multicenter Clinical Trials Using 18F-FDG PET to Measure Early Response to Oncologic Therapy: Effects of Injection-to-Acquisition Time Variability on Required Sample Size.
Kurland BF; Muzi M; Peterson LM; Doot RK; Wangerin KA; Mankoff DA; Linden HM; Kinahan PE
J Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 57(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 26493206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Short 2-[
Indovina L; Scolozzi V; Capotosti A; Sestini S; Taralli S; Cusumano D; Giancipoli RG; Ciasca G; Cardillo G; Calcagni ML
Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():725387. PubMed ID: 34881253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Generation of synthetic PET images of synaptic density and amyloid from
Wang R; Liu H; Toyonaga T; Shi L; Wu J; Onofrey JA; Tsai YJ; Naganawa M; Ma T; Liu Y; Chen MK; Mecca AP; O'Dell RS; van Dyck CH; Carson RE; Liu C
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5115-5129. PubMed ID: 34224153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical feasibility and impact of fully automated multiparametric PET imaging using direct Patlak reconstruction: evaluation of 103 dynamic whole-body
Dias AH; Pedersen MF; Danielsen H; Munk OL; Gormsen LC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Mar; 48(3):837-850. PubMed ID: 32894338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Narrow time-window dual-point 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of thoracic malignancy.
Conrad GR; Sinha P
Nucl Med Commun; 2003 Nov; 24(11):1129-37. PubMed ID: 14569166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of dual-time-point (18)F-FDG PET imaging and partial volume correction in the assessment of solitary pulmonary nodules.
Alkhawaldeh K; Bural G; Kumar R; Alavi A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Feb; 35(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 17938921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new methodology to derive 3D kinetic parametric FDG PET images based on a mathematical approach integrating an error model of measurement.
Colard E; Delcourt S; Padovani L; Thureau S; Dumouchel A; Gouel P; Lequesne J; Ara BF; Vera P; Taïeb D; Gardin I; Barbolosi D; Hapdey S
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Nov; 8(1):99. PubMed ID: 30443801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
