BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34288958)

  • 1. A power approximation for the Kenward and Roger Wald test in the linear mixed model.
    Kreidler SM; Ringham BM; Muller KE; Glueck DH
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254811. PubMed ID: 34288958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials.
    Li P; Redden DT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effect of the violation of normality and sphericity in the linear mixed model in split-plot designs].
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2012; 24(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 22748739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
    Grantham KL; Kasza J; Heritier S; Carlin JB; Forbes AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):112. PubMed ID: 35418034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should we rely on the Kenward-Roger approximation when using linear mixed models if the groups have different distributions?
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):408-29. PubMed ID: 24028625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Closed-form REML estimators and sample size determination for mixed effects models for repeated measures under monotone missingness.
    Tang Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(13):2135-2147. PubMed ID: 28226391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and analysis of a 2-year parallel follow-up of repeated ivermectin mass drug administrations for control of malaria: Small sample considerations for cluster-randomized trials with count data.
    Jackson CL; Colborn K; Gao D; Rao S; Slater HC; Parikh S; Foy BD; Kittelson J
    Clin Trials; 2021 Oct; 18(5):582-593. PubMed ID: 34218684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li P; Redden DT
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of skewness and kurtosis on the Kenward-Roger approximation when group distributions differ.
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2014 May; 26(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 24755032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size requirements for testing treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Maleyeff L; Wang R; Haneuse S; Li F
    Stat Med; 2023 Nov; 42(27):5054-5083. PubMed ID: 37974475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size calculations for group randomized trials with unequal group sizes through Monte Carlo simulations.
    Shi Y; Lee JH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2569-2580. PubMed ID: 30103663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation Methods for Mixed Logistic Models with Few Clusters.
    McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):790-804. PubMed ID: 27802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for choosing an analysis method that controls Type I error for unbalanced cluster sample designs with Gaussian outcomes.
    Johnson JL; Kreidler SM; Catellier DJ; Murray DM; Muller KE; Glueck DH
    Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(27):3531-45. PubMed ID: 26089186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size computations for PK/PD population models.
    Kang D; Schwartz JB; Verotta D
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2005 Dec; 32(5-6):685-701. PubMed ID: 16284914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements I: an adjusted sandwich estimator.
    Skene SS; Kenward MG
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2825-37. PubMed ID: 20839367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multivariate test power approximations for balanced linear mixed models in studies with missing data.
    Ringham BM; Kreidler SM; Muller KE; Glueck DH
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(17):2921-37. PubMed ID: 26603500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test equality and sample size calculation based on risk difference in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):224-36. PubMed ID: 18264992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power calculations for preclinical studies using a K-sample rank test and the Lehmann alternative hypothesis.
    Heller G
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2543-53. PubMed ID: 16025543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kenward-Roger-type corrections for inference methods of network meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Noma H; Hamura Y; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Sep; 14(5):731-741. PubMed ID: 37399845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Type I error control for cluster randomized trials under varying small sample structures.
    Nugent JR; Kleinman KP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):65. PubMed ID: 33812367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.