These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34289601)

  • 21. Implementing separate waste collection and mechanical biological waste treatment in South Africa: a comparison with Austria and England.
    Trois C; Simelane OT
    Waste Manag; 2010; 30(8-9):1457-63. PubMed ID: 20116993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management value chain: A case study from Pakistan.
    Atta U; Hussain M; Malik RN
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Dec; 38(12):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 32812514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Organic Waste Buyback as a Viable Method to Enhance Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries.
    Hettiarachchi H; Meegoda JN; Ryu S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Nov; 15(11):. PubMed ID: 30405058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sustainability indicators for municipal solid waste management: A case study of the Recife Metropolitan Region, Brazil.
    Jucá JFT; Barbosa KRM; Sobral MC
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Dec; 38(12):1450-1454. PubMed ID: 32686608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Alternatives for solid waste management in Isfahan, Iran: a case study.
    Abduli MA; Tavakolli H; Azari A
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 May; 31(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 23444149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.
    Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of socio-economic status and daily variation on municipal solid waste composition: a preliminary analysis for sustainable planning and development in Aligarh City.
    Singh A; Srivastava AK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Oct; 195(11):1301. PubMed ID: 37828370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive driven municipal solid waste management for a city in England.
    Wang D; Tang YT; Long G; Higgitt D; He J; Robinson D
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():452-463. PubMed ID: 31739279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Should we blame the rich for clogging our landfills?
    Trilnick I; Tal A
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Feb; 32(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 24448749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of a geographic information system to find areas for locating of municipal solid waste management facilities.
    Colvero DA; Gomes APD; Tarelho LADC; Matos MAA; Santos KAD
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jul; 77():500-515. PubMed ID: 29735361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The state of municipal solid waste management in Israel.
    Daskal S; Ayalon O; Shechter M
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Jun; 36(6):527-534. PubMed ID: 29708059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Municipal solid waste management strategies in Turkey.
    Turan NG; Coruh S; Akdemir A; Ergun ON
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):465-9. PubMed ID: 18644708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.
    Jeswani HK; Azapagic A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():346-63. PubMed ID: 26906085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Suitability of municipal solid waste in African cities for thermochemical waste-to-energy conversion: The case of Harare Metropolitan City, Zimbabwe.
    Makarichi L; Kan R; Jutidamrongphan W; Techato KA
    Waste Manag Res; 2019 Jan; 37(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 30355247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Forecasting municipal solid waste in Lithuania by incorporating socioeconomic and geographical factors.
    Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene A; Raudonis V; Sutiene K
    Waste Manag; 2022 Mar; 140():31-39. PubMed ID: 35033802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Waste management in Iceland: Challenges and costs related to achieving the EU municipal solid waste targets.
    Óskarsson GK; Agnarsson S; Davíðsdóttir B
    Waste Manag; 2022 Sep; 151():131-141. PubMed ID: 35944430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A technical review of bioenergy and resource recovery from municipal solid waste.
    Nanda S; Berruti F
    J Hazard Mater; 2021 Feb; 403():123970. PubMed ID: 33265011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of old and new municipal solid waste management systems in Denizli, Turkey.
    Ağdağ ON
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):456-64. PubMed ID: 18346887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance assessment of gasification reactors for sustainable management of municipal solid waste.
    Chanthakett A; Arif MT; Khan MMK; Oo AMT
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 291():112661. PubMed ID: 33962284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Municipal solid waste management in Beijing: characteristics and challenges.
    Wang H; Wang C
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Jan; 31(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 23188712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.