These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34291487)

  • 1. Approaches to interpersonal conflict in simulation debriefings: A qualitative study.
    Roze des Ordons AL; Cheng A; Lockyer J; Wilkie RD; Grant V; Eppich W
    Med Educ; 2021 Nov; 55(11):1284-1296. PubMed ID: 34291487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Helping healthcare teams to debrief effectively: associations of debriefers' actions and participants' reflections during team debriefings.
    Kolbe M; Grande B; Lehmann-Willenbrock N; Seelandt JC
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2023 Mar; 32(3):160-172. PubMed ID: 35902231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DE-CODE: a coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions.
    Seelandt JC; Grande B; Kriech S; Kolbe M
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2018; 4(2):51-58. PubMed ID: 35515884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guiding, Intermediating, Facilitating, and Teaching (GIFT): A Conceptual Framework for Simulation Educator Roles in Healthcare Debriefing.
    Roze des Ordons AL; Eppich W; Lockyer J; Wilkie RD; Grant V; Cheng A
    Simul Healthc; 2022 Oct; 17(5):283-292. PubMed ID: 34839303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation.
    Hull L; Russ S; Ahmed M; Sevdalis N; Birnbach DJ
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2017; 3(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 35515097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cultural differences in simulation debriefing: A qualitative analysis.
    Rana SC; Francis U; Zavi L; Ella S; Honein-Abou Haidar G; Peter D
    Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e14904. PubMed ID: 37064463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act.
    Kolbe M; Eppich W; Rudolph J; Meguerdichian M; Catena H; Cripps A; Grant V; Cheng A
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2020; 6(3):164-171. PubMed ID: 35518370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners in simulation-based education: an integrative review.
    Kumar P; Somerville S
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2024 Jan; 9(1):5. PubMed ID: 38229166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DebriefLive: A Pilot Study of a Virtual Faculty Development Tool for Debriefing.
    Wong NL; Peng C; Park CW; Pérez J; Vashi A; Robinson J; Okuda Y
    Simul Healthc; 2020 Oct; 15(5):363-369. PubMed ID: 32218088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Thinking on your feet"-a qualitative study of debriefing practice.
    Krogh K; Bearman M; Nestel D
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2016; 1():12. PubMed ID: 29449981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Debriefing strategies for interprofessional simulation-a qualitative study.
    Holmes C; Mellanby E
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2022 Jun; 7(1):18. PubMed ID: 35717254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating novice doctors' reflections in debriefings after simulation scenarios.
    Kihlgren P; Spanager L; Dieckmann P
    Med Teach; 2015 May; 37(5):437-43. PubMed ID: 25189085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cultural Prototypes and Differences in Simulation Debriefing.
    Ulmer FF; Sharara-Chami R; Lakissian Z; Stocker M; Scott E; Dieckmann P
    Simul Healthc; 2018 Aug; 13(4):239-246. PubMed ID: 29672469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition technology for assessing team debriefing communication and interaction patterns: An algorithmic toolkit for healthcare simulation educators.
    Brutschi R; Wang R; Kolbe M; Weiss K; Lohmeyer Q; Meboldt M
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2024 Oct; 9(1):42. PubMed ID: 39385298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does a Written Tool to Guide Structured Debriefing Improve Discourse? Implications for Interprofessional Team Simulation.
    Thompson R; Sullivan S; Campbell K; Osman I; Statz B; Jung HS
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):e240-e245. PubMed ID: 30093336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The community of inquiry framework for virtual team-to-team debriefings during interprofessional trauma simulations.
    Dickinson KJ; Kimbrough MK; Young A; Goddard C; Urban K; Kalkwarf KJ; Bhavaraju A; Margolick J
    Global Surg Educ; 2022; 1(1):11. PubMed ID: 38624909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perspectives of engagement in distance debriefings.
    Mosher CJ; Morton A; Palaganas JC
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2021 Nov; 6(1):40. PubMed ID: 34749833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams.
    Coggins A; Hong SS; Baliga K; Halamek LP
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2022 Mar; 7(1):7. PubMed ID: 35256014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the Impact of an Asynchronous Online Training Program With Repeated Feedback.
    Woda A; Bradley CS; Johnson BK; Hansen J; Loomis A; Pena S; Singh M; Dreifuerst KT
    Nurse Educ; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 48(5):254-259. PubMed ID: 37000866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.